Written by Sonia Elijah – published in ’Conservative Woman’ – 1st April 2021

IN Parts 1 and 2 of this series, I investigated the failings of the real time RT-PCR test in detecting Covid-19 and the controversies associated with the Corman-Drosten research paper that published its workings.

In Part 3, I go further into these controversies and report on the subsequent launch of the largest class-action lawsuit in history, led by Dr Reiner Fuellmich, centering on the charge of the fraudulently marketed PCR test.

Turning first to the authors of the Corman-Drosten (CD) paper published in Eurosurveillance on January 23, 2020, one of the two lead authors, German virologist Professor Christian Drosten, was one of the first scientists to identify the SARS virus and develop a testing kit for it in 2003. It was his close associate and co-author’s company (Olfert Landt’s TIB Molbiol) that was first to come to market with the SARS testing kit and then later with the RT-PCR testing kit for SARS-CoV-2.

Marco Kaiser, another co-author of the CD paper, is also a scientific adviser to TIB Molbiol. Though there are clear and significant conflicts of interests, they were not stated in the original CD paper. However, after Eurosurveillance’s editorial team were contacted regarding this controversy (and after Drosten and Landt had denied they had a conflict of interest) the paper was finally updated on July 29, 2020, to include the conflict of interest for Landt and Kaiser. Drosten’s name was not included in the conflicts of interests’ statement as one of the editors of Eurosurveillance.

Drosten was turned into an overnight star after developing the real time RT- PCR test for SARS-CoV-2, which was accepted as the standard of testing by the World Health Organisation [WHO]. On March 17, 2020, the German weekly magazine Stern published an article headlined ‘This is how Christian Drosten became the most important man in Germany.’

Drosten is the director of the Institute of Virology at Berlin’s Charité hospital, one of Germany’s largest university hospitals, which happens to be a recipient of generous grants from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Dr Victor Corman, the other lead author of the paper, also works at Charité’s Institute of Virology. Drosten’s evaluations have heavily influenced German government policy on mandatory mask wearing, school closures and lockdowns.

Looking into Dorsten’s career history, we find he was heavily involved in Germany’s swine flu controversy in 2009. He predicted:

 ‘It is a widespread viral infection with side-effects far more severe than anyone could imagine from the most dangerous vaccine.’

At his urging, hundreds of millions of euros was spent on a rushed-through vaccine, GlaxoSmithKline’s Pandemrix. His doomsday prophecy never came to pass, with only 30 confirmed swine flu deaths in Germany. However Pandemrix proved to have severe consequences, with links to narcolepsy in both children and adults. Dorsten’s doomsday prediction echoes that of Professor Neil Ferguson detailed in my investigation into Sage. He similarly warned of 65,000 deaths from swine flu in the UK in 2009; in fact only 457 deaths were linked to the virus. Based on Ferguson’s model, the UK government spent £1.2billion to prepare for the swine flu pandemic. More than 20million doses of vaccine were left over.

Another co-author of the CD research paper is Professor Maria Zambon, a British virologist who is a member of Sage and Nervtag and is on the WHO International Health Regulations emergency committee. Zambon is also director of Reference Microbiology for Public Health England. She is highly influential, both in the UK and on the world stage.

In Part 1 of my investigative report, I wrote that the WHO accepted the Corman-Drosten PCR testing protocol (of which Zambon is a co-author) for the novel coronavirus as early as January 13, 2020, knowing full well that it had not been peer-reviewed at that stage. It was, however, supposedly ‘peer-reviewed’ in an unprecedented 24 hours, the time between when the paper was submitted (January 21) and published (January 23) in Eurosurveillance. This ‘official’ peer review has inexplicably never been released, even after repeated requests by an international consortium of scientists. What is also odd is that the WHO did not declare the novel virus to be a pandemic until almost two months later, on March 11, 2020. The question of whether, as a co-author of the CD paper, Zambon’s influential ties with the WHO helped garner their instant approval of it certainly needs asking.

A close associate of Zambon at PHE’s Virus Reference Department (VRD) based in Colindale, London, is Dr Joanna Ellis, another co-author of the CD paper. She works as the scientific lead in the Respiratory Virus Unit (RVU). The VRD is a WHO-accredited national laboratory. It’s hard not to draw the conclusion that both Zambon and Ellis would have heavily influenced the way the UK government responded to the novel virus by quickly implementing a mass testing programme on an epic scale, using the Corman-Drosten protocol of real time RT-PCR testing for the virus.

As I discussed in Part 1, billions of pounds was spent by the UK government on the country’s mass PCR testing programme that has been proved to be ‘not fit for purpose’ and a gross waste of taxpayers’ money. What’s even more tragic is the way it’s being used to justify the perpetual lockdowns which have devastated lives and led to hundreds of thousands of non-Covid deaths internationally.

What’s also interesting to note is that in the CD paper published in Eurosurveillance, the authors claimed ‘before public release of virus sequences from cases of 2019-nCoV, we relied on social media reports [my emphasis] announcing detection of a SARS-like virus. We thus assumed that a SARS-related CoV is involved in the outbreak’. They go on to report that ‘we downloaded all complete and partial SARS-related virus sequences available in GenBank by 1 January 2020’. This appears to be a significant anomaly as the research paper begins by stating: ‘A novel coronavirus currently termed 2019-nCoV was officially announced as the causative agent by Chinese authorities on 7 January.’

It’s highly questionable why, more than a week before the Chinese authorities officially announced a novel coronavirus named 209-nCoV (later renamed SARS-CoV-2) as ‘the causative agent’, the co-authors decided to ‘rely’ on social media that a SARS-like virus had been detected. The next step they took was to download all the SARS related sequences ‘by January 1’ to develop an RT-PCR test designed to detect this new virus whose genome sequence was not officially been published until January 10.

 In November, 2020, the 22-strong International Consortium of Scientists in Life Sciences (ICSLS) officially challenged the Corman-Drosten (CD) paper, submitting their own external peer review to Eurosurveillance. The lead author was Dr Pieter Borger and among the co-authors was Dr Michael Yeadon, former vice president of Pfizer. I referenced this in Part 1, saying that the external peer review found ten major flaws of the RT-PCR test in detecting SARS-CoV-2. They strongly criticised the CD paper for not undergoing a legitimate peer review and for its ‘flawed science’, and they called its authors ‘intellectually dishonest’.

This brings me to Dr Reiner Fuellmich, a top German and US trial lawyer, who has won unprecedented lawsuits against Deutsche Bank and Volkswagen. He is leading a team of 34 lawyers the group is called Stiftung Corona Ausschuss – (the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry) seeking to prosecute global officials over Covid-19 lockdowns in the largest class-action lawsuit in history. The lawsuits will be launched in Canada and the US, and then can be joined by ‘all affected parties worldwide’. In fact, the first lawsuit has been started in Norway..

A February 2021 article in the Alberta Press states that the suit will ‘target those they believe are responsible for the lockdowns, from local level politicians to the World Health Organisation (WHO) and pharmaceutical companies. They seek damages for people negatively impacted by lockdowns, saying it is a deliberate crime against humanity and must be legally qualified as crimes against humanity, as defined in Section 7 of the International Criminal Code.’

Fuellmich explains: 

Our focus is upon the PCR test because if we manage to convince a court of law that this is a fraudulent PCR test being marketed with the assertion that it can detect infection – if we can convince a court of law that this is a false statement – then the whole house of cards is going to come crashing down.’

In a video presentation posted on YouTube in October 2020 Fuellmich explains how since July 2020 he and his team have been listening to the testimonies of a large number of international scientists and experts ‘to find answers to questions about the corona crisis that people worldwide are asking’. He goes on to argue why ‘this corona crisis must be renamed a corona scandal and [why]those responsible for it must be criminally prosecuted and sued for civil damages . . . so that no one will ever again be in a position of such power as to be able to defraud humanity with their corrupt agendas.’

I for one cannot wait to see how this case will unfold.  Humanity is counting on it.


Saturday 3rd April 2021 – DONATIONS TOTAL:

£ 25,915.82 raised in just over FOUR weeks – WELL DONE and THANK YOU

Thanks to the tremendous generosity of so many of you good people we have succeeded where many said we would fail: in just over four weeks, our team work enabled us to collect the total shown above, which was more than was needed to meet Lyn’s legal expenses. Please note that the ‘landing page’ for donations is now CLOSED. I am sure you will understand that any surplus funds have been passed directly to Lyn, to help her get up and running again.

Now is not the time or place to comment on the actual outcome of those final worrying days which Lyn spent in the Paris Court. Suffice it to say that she has been told to expect a suspended sentence, and that this will be confirmed at a further Court sitting on Wednesday 14th April 2021. Lyn has been told that she need not return to France to attend in person; her lawyer, M. Olivier Forray, will be there on her behalf.

We do not forget David Noakes at this time; that date will be a concern for him, as he has been told to expect a 4-year custodial sentence, although he has 14 days in which to lodge an appeal against this decision.

When we know more about that we will post details. It may be necessary to resume funding for David.

On behalf of Lyn Thyer and her Team, we want to say a special and most sincere ‘THANK YOU‘ to the staff at UK Column for their work in keeping us followers aware and up-to-date on this issue. We will not forget that..

Sincerely yours

Andrew Livingstone – Huddersfield, West Yorkshire



Should the technocrats who pushed governments to lockdown their citizens be tried for crimes against humanity?

One prominent German lawyer, who is also licensed to practice law in America, thinks they should. And he is organizing a team of thousands of participating lawyers who want to prosecute a “second Nuremberg tribunal” against a cadre of international elites responsible for what he calls the “corona fraud scandal.”

Targeting the Davos, Switzerland-based World Economic Forum and its devotees among global political leaders, attorney Reiner Füllmich says they are guilty of crimes against humanity for their perpetration of COVID-response policies that led to forced shutdowns, destroyed businesses, impoverished families, broken lives and a spike in suicide rates.

He has formed the German Corona Investigative Committee to pursue civil charges against the main perpetrators, among them being the head of the United Nations World Health Organization Dr. Tedros Adhanom. He hopes a successful class-action lawsuit will also lead to criminal charges.

Füllmich was on the legal team that won a major lawsuit against German automaker Volkswagen in a 2015 case involving tampered catalytic converters in the U.S. He also was involved in a lawsuit that exposed one of Germany’s largest banks, Deutsche Bank, as a criminal enterprise. The bank was recently ordered by the U.S. Justice Department to pay $130 million to resolve corrupt practices that included money laundering, bribery and fraud between the years 2009 and 2016.

Füllmich is licensed to practice law in Germany and the state of California.

He believes the frauds committed by Volkswagen and Deutsche Bank pale in comparison to the damage wrought by those who sold the Covid-19 crisis as the worst viral outbreak to hit the world in more than a century and used it to cause media-driven panic, government overreach and human suffering on a scale still not fully quantified.

The truth is revealed in the numbers, Füllmich said, citing figures that show COVID-19 has not caused any statistically significant increase in the 2020 death counts over previous years.

The scam perpetrated on humanity hinged on one dirty little secret, he said – the PCR Test.

Not only are these tests not approved for diagnostic purposes but the inventor of the PCR Test, the late Kary Mullis, explicitly stated in an interview that this was never the purpose of his test.

Füllmich explains in the video below how the coronavirus response of governments worldwide working in cahoots with the Bill Gates-funded U.N. World Health Organization “are probably the biggest crimes against humanity ever committed.”

Here is a summarized translation of the most-recent update Füllmich put out on his German website on Feb. 15:

“The hearings of around 100 internationally renowned scientists, doctors, economists and lawyers, which have been conducted by the Berlin Commission of Inquiry into the COVID-19 affair since 10.07.2020, have in the meantime shown with a probability close to certainty that the COVID-19 scandal was at no time a health issue.  Rather, it was about solidifying the illegitimate power (illegitimate because it was obtained by criminal methods) of the corrupt ‘Davos clique’ by transferring the wealth of the people to the members of the Davos clique, destroying, among other things, small and medium-sized enterprises in particular. Platforms such as Amazon, Google, Uber, etc. could thus appropriate their market share and wealth.”

Was the vaccine the reason for the virus?

Perhaps the most egregious outgrowth of the coronavirus scam has been the fear-mongering that not only led to devastating and non-scientific shutdowns but also the rush to market of an unproven, experimental vaccine, which is now making billions of dollars for Big Pharma.

Just like the lockdowns, the vaccine is unnecessary because there are already several well-documented treatments involving long-established drugs [Budesonide] that are proven safe and widely available. Also just like the lockdowns, this vaccine carries potentially devastating long-term effects on human health. There are questions about its effects on the fertility of men and women: the vaccine has already caused 50 times more deaths in the U.S. than are being admitted via their VAERS [Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System]. In the U.K. it is reported that, as of Saturday April 3rd 2021 , there have been 2,207 deaths in Scotland alone, occurring within 28 days of having accepted the jab. None of this is being mentioned in the MSM..

To make matters worse, it is becoming plainly obvious that the intent is to make this experimental vaccine mandatory for all of humanity. It was billionaire vaccine investor Bill Gates who originally floated the idea, in April 2020, that humanity could never return to “normal” until “we have a vaccine that we’ve gotten out to basically the entire world.”

This reporter predicted last April that the vaccine would eventually be made mandatory, largely by corporations using coercive tactics.

With a hat-tip to Leo Hohmann – an independent journalist whose work is 100 percent reader supported. Contributions of any size are appreciated. Send c/o Leo Hohmann, PO Box 291, Newnan, GA 30264 or by credit card using the donate button below.


Please listen to this very important 49-minute video .
Here a highly-qualified medical blows the whistle on the corrupt practices at the World Health Organization.
This is the ‘inside track’ on what is really going on at the World Health Organization [WHO], where we are told that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has ‘bought’ itself a seat at the top table, with the Global Alliance on Vaccine Initiative – to ensure that their vaccines will be on the WHO programme.
The GAVI gives total Immunity from prosecution to both the manufacturers and the suppliers of any of the vaccines which are now being foisted onto you.
This ‘GAVI’ is not legally qualified even to have representation in an Organization which only allows ‘countries’ to be members, but BGF has bribed its way in and has at the same time signed parallel agreements with every one of the countries who are ‘legitimate’ WHO members.
This GAVI is a corporation but has arranged not to have to pay any taxes in Switzerland. Please do persevere with the video, in German/English, (most parts are translated into English).
Rainer Fuellmich is a big-hitting lawyer, licensed to practice in California as well as in Europe. He is the guy who exposed the VW fraud on emissions from diesel vehicles. The group are taking action to bring a ‘Nuremberg-style ‘ trial of the Big Pharma plus these people who imagine that their enormous wealth renders them ‘beyond prosecution’.
This is extremely significant information. Right at the end, the Norwegian Dr Astrid Stuckelberger tells us that the WHO, whilst ordering every member state to accept that the PCR test is to be used, has also published in the very same document – SMALL PRINT – that the confounded test is not going to be reliable. But who reads the small print??
Here is the link: I suggest you save it somewhere and SHARE it; we are being taken for mugs and it has to stop.
Rainer Fuellmich is the guy to do it – if he doesn’t have an unfortunate accident

As a result, your government wants to convince you to accept an experimental vaccine, without ANY liability against either the manufacturer(s) or the supplier(s), this to deal with a viral infection which is showing (ONS figures) a 99.8% survival rate – and YOU think that I am the ‘absolutely b****y stupid one for declining such a risk? There have already been more than 200 UK deaths following the injection of this unproven material. Information about its composite parts was previously up on Wikipedia – but has since been taken down..