Active, Constitutional, Democracy, Political



🆘 ❓Want to attend a protest?❓Want to block entrances to Parliament?❓Want to chain or lock yourself to a building or person?❓Causing too much noise?❓Causing an obstruction to major transport works? You face JAIL TIME.   Well, at least that’s what is drafted in the new Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill, which is going to Report Stage at the House of Lords where these clauses and amendments will be voted on on 8th, 13th and 15th Dec before going back to the House of Commons where TORIES have the majority vote [in the new year].   

THIS NEW ABHORRENT “ACT” WILL USURP OUR: ❕FREEDOM of ASSOCIATION❕FREEDOM of SPEECH❕FREEDOM to PROTEST❕FREEDOM of EXPRESSION❕FREEDOM from GOVERNMENT INTERFERENCE and lastly, our FREEDOM to fight against TYRANNY! THE NEW PROPOSALS INCLUDE: ❌ For “locking on” or being “equipped” to lock on, whether it be a person, object, or land, if it causes disruption to 2 or more people or an organisation, you may spend up to 51 wks in jail❌ New stop and search powers, with or without suspicion [i.e. they need no reason to stop/search you], and, if you resist you may be arrested and can land yourself a jail sentence.❌ For obstructing transport works [i.e. HS2] or block entrances/roads to Parliament – consider a jail sentence.❌ “Serious Disruption Prevention Orders” which would prevent any person or organisation from protesting from 1 week to up to 2 yrs, including using the internet to share or induce others to protesting activities. 

These proposals have been put forward by TORY LORDS and PRITI PATEL; 20 pages of revisions sneaked in at a very late stage meaning there is no full parliamentary scrutiny [again].   THE NEW AMENDMENTS AND CLAUSES WILL BE VOTED ON IN PARLIAMENT BY HOUSE OF LORDS ON: 📌 Wednesday 8th December📌 Monday 13th December📌 Wednesday 15th December Parliament Sq ⛓Confer in small trusted groups and make YOUR plan for the days.  How far are YOU willing to go for the Right to Protest? We need to show them who is the MASTER and who is the SERVANT.  Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill amendments here: #UniteForFreedom

Common Law, Democracy, Political

Weh dem, der aus der Reihe tanzt**!

How many of us knew that Obergruppenfuehrerin Merkel was actually born Victoria Kastner – in the USA? Nothing these days is ever quite what it appears to be at first glance.

In truth, I am less interested in her than I am in the New World (Dis)Order of which she is just one of the many pawns on the board. What to do about it all?

We now have a police service more interested in what we British sheeple are thinking, rather than concentrating on their historical (since Sir Robert Peel – 1829) role, viz:

“The primary object of an efficient police is the preservation of life and property and the prevention of crime”

The primary object of today’s police is now bordering on the Orwellian Room 101 (if you don’t comply we’ll let rats eat out your eyes) mindset.

All of us, uninvited immigrants, as well as polite septuagenarians who can remember Ration Books, are walking around with coinage in our pocket, every piece carrying the image of our Sovereign Lady, plus the pledge, which she made, back in 1952,

Dei Gratia (D,.G.) by the grace of g-d (let’s not offend anyone here)

Fidei Defensor (F.D.) – defender of the Faith – the right to believe, (if you find that easier)

yet we hear that it is ‘offensive’ or ‘inciteful of racial tension’ should a follower of the resurrected Messiah (= R.C. – Jesus) dare to stand on a public street and read aloud from his Bible. However, if you are an Islamite, it is tolerated that you go around randomly stabbing people, whilst screaming out that ‘Allah is the greatest’ – just because we don’t happen to share the same view of g-d as the Prophet would have it.

Either way, Jo and Joe Public are now being straight-jacketed, told what to think, what to say, where (and where not) to say it, all against a backdrop of egotistical Tory treason, where the only place in which Democracy survives intact is – the Cabinet Room.

Here is today’s example, (with a hat-tip to the DFLA) and published online, thanks to the courage and determination of the editors at Kipper Central..

Editors Note: Facebook have continually censored this post.

“I guess, like me, you will have heard of the case involving Tommy Robinson. Not just Tommy of course, R B Inman, Darrell Goodliffe etc who have all had their Facebook pages taken down.

Other groups have also been taken down. It seems we are entering into a new a dark era in the history of our country.

The darkness is that of the Silencing of speech, the Silencing of communication. There is a reason behind this.


This has been a peculiar week for those of us involved in the struggle to keep our nation afloat. (This is not an elitist article, if you are reading this you are involved in that struggle and I count you as a fellow soldier.)

From the Labour Party and Corbyn announcing he is wanting a second referendum to the formation of an undemocratic political party in the Houses of Parliament. (Did anyone vote this new party into place?) From worrying signals of Brexit not being carried through to the exposè of the criminals behind Panorama to the closing down of TR and company on FB and Twitter, something tells me they are all linked.


For me this is textbook tactics taking place. Those who have military experience will understand straight away.

If you go to war you can paralyse the enemy effectively by taking out the leaders, then communications. The enemy can then be dealt with in a piecemeal fashion.

Are we seeing this happen as we speak? Leaders taken out, groups taken down. There can be no denying that this has happened. The question is why. Why now, when there are ominous warnings about Brexit, when our government are turning their back on the people, when the EU are insulting the English people in ever growing malice.


Communication is the key to any idea, to any movement. If you stop people communicating you have a free ride and can rule in peace.

Over the years we have seen politicians clamp down on free speech. They have done this in many ways: Sexism, racism, hate crime, hate speech, Islamophobic, homophobia, femophobia political correctness. Then when Facebook came along, it all went on line. People thought they could speak freely. Not a bit of it. Cyber police, online crime hub, censorship.

Just why is it if I say something on line I get the police doing a raid (Trust me, 12 coppers at 6am for me saying that Corbyn and Fascism are the same and quoting a speech from Hitler to prove it) when 20 miles down the road over 200 girls under 16 are being raped by Muslim rape Gangs and nothing is done.

You explain.

No, the facts are there. Freedom of speech is being removed.


Throughout history freedom of speech has been an essential part of any race and its development. Freedom of speech has been the prerequisite of all idea and expression. Without freedom of speech there would be no art, no music, no film, no Facebook, no pyramids, no Eiffel Tower, no London Bridge, Stonehenge, football, cricket, theory of evolution. You name anything and it only became possible through freedom of speech.

Without freedom of speech there would be no moon landings, no flight, no science, philosophy, exploration, cures in medicine, romance, drama, all would be gone.

According to Liberties International, “Some EU governments are not respecting freedom of speech. Some of them put pressure on public service media to report in a way that is biased in favour of the government.”

You want to tell me the BBC or Facebook are not undergoing this pressure?


Without freedom of speech there can be no functioning of society, there can be no democracy. Galile Galileo was placed under house arrest and described as an insane heretic in his day. Yet now he is considered the father between philosophy and Modern science. There are many cases of this nature, from Martin Luther King who challenged and threatened the modern society of his time. Can you imagine if America had treated him the way our Government and media treat Tommy Robinson?

Imagine everything that we would miss out on, the years it would have set us back in terms of progression?

I am no direct fan of Tommy Robinson. I respect the guy and admire his courage but it is plain to see that if you criticise the religion of Islam you are labeled as a racist or Islamophobe, there is no middle ground. Indeed people have died at the hands of the followers of this religion for being critical.

Any views that challenge the current political stranglehold are not allowed and you will instantly be shouted down and again labeled as racist etc…… Say anything that contradicts Labour or Conservative or that is critical of the system and again you are right wing.

Your words are watched daily, your actions monitored on CCTV. You are only one step away from being locked up.

Criticise Khan on crime, you are racist, criticise Muslim rape gangs, you are racist.

Your opponents cannot debate, they cannot rationalise, they merely shout and use slogans, why?

Because they have lost the ability to use freedom of speech.

When we lose the ability to debate, we lose the ability to reason and thus the ability to use free speech.


It is only too obvious that society as a whole, can only function when allowed to practice freedom of speech.

Now Freedom of speech does not give you the right to insult. As Plato stated: “When one resorts to insults one had lost the debate already”

This is something I agree with. However When speaking out against politics or religion, are you insulting an individual or the political belief?

An insult on a belief is not a personal insult, I wish people could tell the difference! In today’s society they cannot. They do not get the logic of debate or the understanding of cut and thrust in debate.

If we take today’s society and apply its logic what would we have?

Well based on Tommy Robinson Lenin would be called a racist: “Religion is the opiate of the masses”

Well that is hate speech. Saying that Islam is a drug that enslaves people and will kill them is hateful and Islamophobic.

But no, What Lenin said is OK, as long as you apply it to Christianity.

Karl Marx said that mankind will only be free when it emancipates itself from the jew.

(Hitler called this final solution).

This is hate speech. Yet millions follow this line of thinking.

Jeremy Corbyn who gave money to a holocaust denier, friends with Hamas etc…. Well, he has not got into trouble has he?


This is a Chinese curse. It is always the interesting times that cause the most difficult lives in history.

In a week where a black Christian preacher was arrested but Muslims praying on London Bridge (Scene of a violent terrorist attack) were not arrested at all despite seizing up traffic. In a week where a political party is formed to go against the Democratic rights of the people, in a week where Corbyn calls for a second referendum, we have the UKIP activists shut down on Facebook.

On a week that Tommy Robinson smashes the BBC in public and blatantly calls them liars Facebook closes down his account and several Facebook people and groups pages.

When did Facebook sell out and become the informant for the Government?

You have the right to be worried. You have the right to take action.

Take action or take slavery.

Your choice.” end quote.

There is a pressing need for fewer ego-trips and greater unity of purpose; which is why we offer, via ‘’ a rallying point for all of us, as this oppression continues to escalate. A way forward DOES present itself; it will take more of that courage and determination, but the time is near when you will be arrested…

** translation ‘ “Woe unto him that steppeth out of line!”

Democracy, Political

Thank you, Stephen Place

As an ex rank and file copper who has policed the streets I am now the biggest and loudest advocate for Police Officers throughout the country. Their job, it could be argued with empirical  evidence by the bucket load, has never ever been more dangerous nor so poorly supported by both government and public alike.

Yesterday though [Sunday 24th Feb], we saw two Police Officers who, by virtue of a video, appear to have crossed the line of professionalism and may have just acted beyond their legal remit.

An elderly looking man was preaching in London on the road side. Two officers approach and claim they have had a report that this gentleman, Bible in hand has been ‘Islamaphobic’. Now, due to the video beginning when the officers arrive, it cannot be established whether or not he had uttered anything Islamaphobic. One can only hope they have a written statement or some other evidence to prove the allegation.

A verbal altercation takes place and then the police officers grab the man and take his Bible. The man is heard pleading for the officers not to take his bible, the more aggressive of the two is heard to say “You should have thought about that before you decided to be racist”. I have not heard him utter anything racist whilst talking to them. They therefore have a report via telephone to suggest he has.

They say he has disturbed the Queens peace. They arrest him for this, handcuff him and take him away.

Several things come out of this action, not least is the ‘direct correlation’ between Christianity and Islam, and the way the Police, especially in London, prosecute the law which appertains to these ‘religions’.

There are many incidents of Muslims praying in the road stopping traffic and also at Speakers Corner in Hyde Park. Both are criminal offences and neither of these are prosecuted.

Public gatherings which demonstrate against the building of large mosques in many towns are heavily policed. Marches by Muslims calling for the death of our serving soldiers, and calling for those whose corpses being returned in coffins via Brize Norton to ‘burn in hell’ are not prosecuted.

Those who take part in marches, demonstrations and rallies, flying the proscribed ISIS flag – are not prosecuted. However, those carrying the Union Jack in public at events such as the Durham Miners Gala – are stopped and told to take the flag away.

Never before have we witnessed these double standards being applied by the UK Police when it comes to religious public displays than what took place today.

I hope the chap gets his Bible back and is let out of the station with no charge. I hope that the officers look at the video doing the rounds of social media and reflect on their actions.

With a grateful ‘hat-tip’ to Stephen Place; there aren’t many prepared to tell it like it is

Constitutional, Democracy

‘Do we live in a democracy’?

At a public meeting in York recently, the audience was asked this simple question, and, surprisingly, from a crowd of adults, the response was muted – many of us were not too sure..

Using the ‘false flag’ of ‘democracy’, the UK ‘Party System’ has, over a great many years, evolved to become a cancer, a perpetual revolution against the truths of the English Constitution.

Edmund Burke, [1730-1797] a one-time MP for Malton, North Yorkshire wrote:

“Whenever Parliament is persuaded to assume the role of executive government it will lose all the confidence, love and veneration which it has ever enjoyed whilst it was supposed to be the corrective and control on the acting powers of the state..”

Here is another quote to reiterate the present position:

“The Party System does not consist, as some suppose, of two parties, but only of ONE. If there were two real parties there could be no system. In the presence of this inner obstacle, a VOTE becomes about as valuable as a railway ticket when there is a permanent block on the line”

G.K. Chesterton – A Short History of England

We need to learn, and learn quickly, that

the rule of (common) law is the absolute condition for personal liberty and true democracy in a free society. Without it, we will have the rule of tyrants.

Let us assume, as seems extremely likely, that the present Tory leader will NOT achieve any sort of ‘deal’ for her to-ing and fro-ing across the Channel. After the charade which we have witnessed over the past two years, do you honestly think we can trust politicians of ANY colour, to fulfil the terms of the Referendum vote?

Not BLUE, not RED, the SNP? They are all against it; as for LibDems, Greens, even UKIP, – the party which fought for so long to persuade the Tories to ALLOW us to choose by Referendum – can’t now stop fighting amongst themselves. Even recently (July 30 2018) they were still in dispute over the function of their NEC.

So, are you going to mention the newly-formed DVP, or perhaps, FOR BRITAIN? It takes 5 years and around £20m in funds to establish any new party which would even START to make a dent in the Tory ranks.

At that next election, what do you imagine you will really achieve, unless you use your vote to kick the corrupt parties out of Parliament, by the simple alternative of voting for an INDEPENDENT candidate?

The fact of the matter is that we have become a very lazy society, and we have let ourselves, by habit and convenience, be lulled into accepting the adage first promoted by Harold Macmillan

“We’ve never had it so good.”

Many of us have ceased to think very deeply for ourselves, with the result that we have, as a nation, been sleep-walked into accepting what has been published to us, from the end of World War II onwards.

The fact is that, just seven years after we had finally (with the help of our former colonies across the pond, and many brave Commonwealth – and Polish – souls) put the Fatherland back in its place, there was already a plan in hand to achieve, by economic means, what the Austrian painter/decorator (as my now deceased German brother-in-law used to say – ‘der war auch Asylant’) had failed to do with his super-efficient ‘Wehrmacht’ = ‘Defence Force’ – there’s a bitter laugh.

The late King George VI was only three months laid to rest when Jean Monnet, one of the founding fathers of the European Union, was writing to a friend – 30th April 1952:

‘Europe’s nations should be guided towards the super-state (1952??) without their people understanding what is happening. This can be accomplished by successive steps, each disguised as having an ‘economic’ purpose, but which will eventually and irreversibly lead to federation.’

Now, I could list for you, every single piece of ‘statute’ which has been moulded and fiddled to fit in with that mantra of the unelected oligarchy, masquerading as a benevolent unifying presence, from 1948 right through to 2009 – but you know most of them, don’t you?

What a close examination of the text and purport of all the ‘Treaties’ shows us is, that those who have held the position of ‘UK Leader’, under their version of ‘democracy’, have sold our country’s soul to the devil – as surely as Faust lost his shadow to Mephistopheles..

So, we come, late in the day, to the frightening conclusion that we are in imminent danger of being totally emasculated as a nation, of having a minor role in an ever-growing federation of half-convinced ‘states’ (note how THAT word crept in) – are we to be the Northern Section of some cooked-up French arrondisement?

All of which can still be averted, by simply reasserting our inalienable rights as freemen/women under the Great Charter of 1215, as confirmed by the Bill of Rights 1689.

The ‘Party System’ in UK politics is DEAD, not fit for purpose (never was) and must be removed if our nation is to retain any vestige of status, dignity and self-government.

Forget Facebook, typing and ranting will not save us – ‘Shadowbanning’ is already in hand, closing down your right to think and speak freely. Send an email address today, to

for further action, whilst there is still time.       See also       

Other important sources: