Hey-up!!, somebody’s after changin t’way our cities and towns across England are gonna work in’t near future, and our town Huddersfield seems to be on’t ‘hit list’.
Well, we don’t want their 15-minute nonsense here. Take a look at this flyer.
We intend to say a big fat NO!! – and we’re meeting in the centre of town.
Saturday 29th April 2023 on New Street – around 12 Noon.
If you really ARE our friends and co-workers, please do come, stand with us on this date, to show that we are not putting up with this treatment – not for a moment, never mind 15 minutes.
Please let your contacts know, bring as many as possible and let us know you are coming – by email to info@livingstones.uk.
Think on, bring banners, bring placards, bring White Rose flags, bring gongs and drums, just make sure you’re here on
Saturday 29th April 2023 on New Street – around High Noon.
‘We note the following statement on the present website of the Crown agents, acting as our present ‘government’
Parliamentary sovereignty is a principle of the UK constitution. It makes Parliament the supreme legal authority in the UK, which can create or end any law. Generally, the courts cannot overrule its legislation and no Parliament can pass laws that future Parliaments cannot change. Parliamentary sovereignty is the most important part of the UK constitution.
We believe this assertion to be treasonous: it should be countered by us, the people, who have naively been selecting the 650-odd incumbents for those green benches for generations.
Those of us who still have faith in our common law position, and the constitution which has been based upon common law, must now do something about this…
With a hat-tip to Martin Geddes for tackling this crime head-on. Please consider supporting his work and co-ordinate thought and action via ‘Truth Social’ at https://truthsocial.com
There were United Nations troops, seen operating openly on English soil this week – in Norfolk. What we may expect next is a lockdown which will have little to do with SARS-Cov2, other than that both are believed to be being used by the same ‘authority’ to manoeuvre all the little sheeple back into their respective pens.
Here is an example of how ‘masons’ work. Those of us who value the natural, common law have a built-in sensor: we can sense, almost smell, when there is something unhealthy going on among those who think they were born with the authority to lead the sheeple astray.
We make no apology for quoting, now and then, from the book on which her Britannic Majesty, on June 2 1953, solemnly undertook to lead and defend our national (and international) identity:
and there are several references in both the Old and the New Covenant writings to a stone having been ‘cut out of the mountain without hands’ which, when the leaders of the day came up against it, would ‘break them in pieces’ but which, if, having been confronted with it, they chose to disregard it, would drop on them and ‘grind them to dust’ – which seems to us to be a clear reminder about being truthful and humble when you are the ones, selected, after all, by the sovereign people, to occupy the ‘hot’ seats, you had best keep in mind the ‘Nolan Principles’ – (see the end of this article).
If you refer back to our blog site, you’ll read how the present ‘leaders’ are grossly failing in their duty to carry out Her Majesty’s solemn promise:
Being a common barrator was an offence under the common law of England. It was classified as a misdemeanour. It consisted of “persistently stirring up quarrels in the Courts or out of them”. It is uncertain whether, in the ordinary way, persons charged with commission of the offence were dealt with by indictment.[4]
In 1966, the Law Commission recommended for the offence to be abolished.[5] It said that there had been no indictments for this offence for “many years” and that, as an indictable misdemeanour, it was “wholly obsolete”.[4] Its recommendation was implemented by the Criminal Law Act 1967.
In Scots law, barratry referred to the crime committed by a judge who is induced by bribery to pronounce judgment….
The up-to-date situation is that the ‘Tories’ are trying to push through the system a ‘Human Rights Reform Bill’ which will also chip another piece off the Common Law – by ‘abolish(ing) the common law offence of ‘riot’, so, it would seem that shortly, we shall even be in trouble for getting upset about the fact that ‘they’ are planning to stop the sheeple even getting out of the ‘pen’, let alone start thinking for ourselves.
Appendix:
The Nolan Principles – Seven Principles for service in the public interest
1. The Seven Principles of Public Life
The Seven Principles of Public Life (also known as the Nolan Principles) apply to anyone who works as a public office-holder. This includes all those who are elected or appointed to public office, nationally and locally, and all people appointed to work in the Civil Service, local government, the police, courts and probation services, non-departmental public bodies (NDPBs), and in the health, education, social and care services. All public office-holders are both servants of the public and stewards of public resources. The principles also apply to all those in other sectors delivering public services.
1.1 Selflessness
Holders of public office should act solely in terms of the public interest.
1.2 Integrity
Holders of public office must avoid placing themselves under any obligation to people or organizations that might try inappropriately to influence them in their work. They should not act or take decisions in order to gain financial or other material benefits for themselves, their family, or their friends. They must declare and resolve any interests and relationships.
1.3 Objectivity
Holders of public office must act and take decisions impartially, fairly and on merit, using the best evidence and without discrimination or bias.
1.4 Accountability
Holders of public office are accountable to the public for their decisions and actions and must submit themselves to the scrutiny necessary to ensure this.
1.5 Openness
Holders of public office should act and take decisions in an open and transparent manner. Information should not be withheld from the public unless there are clear and lawful reasons for so doing.
1.6 Honesty
Holders of public office should be truthful.
1.7 Leadership
Holders of public office should exhibit these principles in their own behaviour and treat others with respect. They should actively promote and robustly support the principles and challenge poor behaviour wherever it occurs.
This is the full version [1hr 28mins] of the video from which an extract was released earlier this week.
It is clear that Reiner Fuellmich (and Viviane Fischer) have realised that the United States Grand Jury will ALSO now be under the control of a Democratic Party, which is in league with the WEF-controlled United Nations, and therefore they now open their investigations to world public scrutiny. The truth needs no cloak.
Those of us who know Fullmich’s pedigree can be sure that he is not the type to be side-lined or brow-beaten into silence, having successfully confronted and exposed both industrial and financial criminality (Volkswagen Group and Deutsche Bank).
We recommend this lengthy but very significant recording for your serious consideration. You will know how to read this:
http : / / odysee dot com / @ Banned You Tube Videos : 4 / Grand – Jury – Day – 1:2
It is set out here as the first of a series of public hearings, to show beyond reasonable doubt that there has been a long-planned scheme to deceive the common wo/man and gain illicit control of society.
It is intended that the subsequent weekly hearings will also be made fully public since the truth needs no protection from scrutiny.
Let us all unite in the prayer that this brave work will not now be scuppered by the black hearts. We note that one of the nominated witnesses – Dr Luc Montagnier – is reported to have died recently (since February 6th)
12 February 2022
Published with grateful thanks to our fellow-warrior [PD] who brought this to our attention
LIVING STONES 