Common Law, Spiritual

Sovereign Natural Empowerment

Here ‘Karen-Ruth’ describes her journey from illegal corporate

entrapment into liberty under a natural, divine, common law

“It was a health issue in 2018 which made me take a closer look at the medical profession and what I now know as ‘Big Pharma’.  I discovered new voices such as Judy Mikovits, Sherri Tenpenny, Ty and Charlene Bollinger, Del Bigtree, Robert F Kennedy Jr, and Catherine Austin Fitts.  They opened up for me a parallel world to the one I was living in, and it didn’t take long to realise, things were not as they seemed. The medical world was less of a caring profession, and more of a money-making industry

And that was just the start of it.  It became crystal clear that the world is being organised and controlled by a very few, an unelected oligarchy, who seem to have their tentacles into everything.  A tiny number of people, with extreme private wealth, appeared to own or control almost everything on the planet that we need to survive: the world’s food, water, agriculture, health, media, education, retail, banking; and, by controlling these industries, they also have gained control over the governments of the world.

The world as I knew it, all the ‘facts’ and ‘figures’, information, our courts, our justice and security, war and peace – are all an illusion. All cunningly facilitated by our banking system, and everything backed up by the legal system. 

Almost all of us, appear to have unwittingly handed over responsibility for all things necessary to exist and survive to others: our food, water, health, nutrition, education, protection, even our judgement. All of this now being provided almost exclusively by others.  And when we can’t provide for ourselves or our family, we have become very easy to control  – by these our providers.

Things had to change, but what could I do?

Then, along came ‘Covid’.  A war being waged upon us – silently, by stealth. I started hearing about sovereignty and the common law of the land.  Now, I’d been to law school, so I know what’s gets taught there, and more importantly, i know what isn’t taught.  We’d been taught about common law, that it was case law, based on judge-made precedents.  What I was hearing about now, the common law of the land, wasn’t anything to do with what we’d been fed as fact at law school.

I tried to find out more, and eventually I began to realise that this common law, the common law of the land that I was now discovering, is real law, natural law, which has been completely usurped by the legal system. This law, real law, is not taught at law school, and it became clear that the confusion was created on purpose, obfuscation by design. 

This confusion is present in every part of the system.  It runs through lawyers, judges, academics, magistrates, barristers, court clerks, and more.  And it’s difficult to hear, after you’ve invested so much of your life in study, that your chosen profession is little more than a gigantic money making industry designed to control people by trickery, deception and fraud. 

This applies equally to our medical profession, and to the education system too. 

I joined the Guardians 300 and became a trainer with them.  I’m in awe at the depth of knowledge of the people I learnt from there.  In awe of how they’ve patiently waited for decades for the rest of us to catch up. But catch up we must, and this knowledge needs to be shared.  I now work independently yet in collaboration with EbMCsquared to spread this simple but powerful message far and wide.

We all learning now what we should have been taught as young people.  That we are sovereign, we are free-born living individuals, and that the rules are simple, not complicated.  We don’t need to hire any expensive lawyer to represent us, we don’t need a corporate police ‘force’ to stamp government policy into us.  We can manage ourselves, and the rules are clear: we cause no harm, no loss, no injury to anyone, and we know that our rights persist where legalism fails.  That’s it.  When we stick to these rules, we can do no wrong, and everything that is not a wrong is our right. We are more than capable of judging whenever someone is wrong.  We don’t need a legal society and literally millions of pieces of government rules, regulations and legislation for that. 

Nor do we need a multi-billion dollar human rights industry to ensure our rights.  Its very existence would like to infer that ‘right’s can be given and taken away.  We are born with our rights, no one gives them to us, and no one can take them away.

Everyone is equal under common law, and

no one is above the common law.

To take away another’s natural unalienable rights would be to put someone under man-made statute.  No one else can own or have your rights, they are yours.  So, how could anyone replace those rights with something man-made and try to tell you they have the authority to do so?  It is a false flag industry, creating fear and control under the guise of welfare and protection. Unless you’ve broken the law, (the real law, not an act of statute), you remain truly free: only a slave could have rights given or taken away.  So, are we slaves or are we free?

To be free is to be sovereign.  Therefore, we are responsible for ourselves, to provide for ourselves and our family – and we can do this with the free help of others, but not by the control of tyrants.  We keep any government in its place; it exists as an administrator of the realm and nothing more.

We create government to serve the people, and they are there to work for us.  We control government, it is not the other way around.  They govern only with our consent, and anything they do or say should happen with our express agreement.  Without our agreement, their self-described  ‘laws’ are merely acts of law and have no force.  The present government is a corporation, and their decisions are no more than corporate policy, with no bearing on us whatsoever unless we give our genuine consent.

Let me help you find your way to sovereignty, then you can help others find theirs.  This site ** contains an online course, with tools, and a blog to help you on your sovereign way.”  


As always, we attach a pdf copy for you to pass on to those wise souls who are not tied to keyboards all day long!

Common Law, Democracy, Spiritual

Chipping away at our Foundation Stone

Here is an example of how ‘masons’ work. Those of us who value the natural, common law have a built-in sensor: we can sense, almost smell, when there is something unhealthy going on among those who think they were born with the authority to lead the sheeple astray.

We make no apology for quoting, now and then, from the book on which her Britannic Majesty, on June 2 1953, solemnly undertook to lead and defend our national (and international) identity:

and there are several references in both the Old and the New Covenant writings to a stone having been ‘cut out of the mountain without hands’ which, when the leaders of the day came up against it, would ‘break them in pieces’ but which, if, having been confronted with it, they chose to disregard it, would drop on them and ‘grind them to dust’ – which seems to us to be a clear reminder about being truthful and humble when you are the ones, selected, after all, by the sovereign people, to occupy the ‘hot’ seats, you had best keep in mind the ‘Nolan Principles’  – (see the end of this article).

If you refer back to our blog site, you’ll read how the present ‘leaders’ are grossly failing in their duty to carry out Her Majesty’s solemn promise:

This extract from ‘Wikipedia’ shows the kind of obfuscation in which their ‘legal eagles’ simply revel –

England and Wales[edit]

In England and Wales the common law offence of being a common barrator was abolished by section 13(1)(a) of the Criminal Law Act 1967.

Being a common barrator was an offence under the common law of England. It was classified as a misdemeanour. It consisted of “persistently stirring up quarrels in the Courts or out of them”. It is uncertain whether, in the ordinary way, persons charged with commission of the offence were dealt with by indictment.[4]

In 1966, the Law Commission recommended for the offence to be abolished.[5] It said that there had been no indictments for this offence for “many years” and that, as an indictable misdemeanour, it was “wholly obsolete”.[4] Its recommendation was implemented by the Criminal Law Act 1967.


In Scots law, barratry referred to the crime committed by a judge who is induced by bribery to pronounce judgment….

The up-to-date situation is that the ‘Tories’ are trying to push through the system a ‘Human Rights Reform Bill’ which will also chip another piece off the Common Law – by ‘abolish(ing) the common law offence of ‘riot’, so, it would seem that shortly, we shall even be in trouble for getting upset about the fact that ‘they’ are planning to stop the sheeple even getting out of the ‘pen’, let alone start thinking for ourselves.


The Nolan Principles – Seven Principles for service in the public interest

1.       The Seven Principles of Public Life

The Seven Principles of Public Life (also known as the Nolan Principles) apply to anyone who works as a public office-holder. This includes all those who are elected or appointed to public office, nationally and locally, and all people appointed to work in the Civil Service, local government, the police, courts and probation services, non-departmental public bodies (NDPBs), and in the health, education, social and care services. All public office-holders are both servants of the public and stewards of public resources. The principles also apply to all those in other sectors delivering public services.

1.1     Selflessness

Holders of public office should act solely in terms of the public interest.

1.2     Integrity

Holders of public office must avoid placing themselves under any obligation to people or organizations that might try inappropriately to influence them in their work. They should not act or take decisions in order to gain financial or other material benefits for themselves, their family, or their friends. They must declare and resolve any interests and relationships.

1.3     Objectivity

Holders of public office must act and take decisions impartially, fairly and on merit, using the best evidence and without discrimination or bias.

1.4     Accountability

Holders of public office are accountable to the public for their decisions and actions and must submit themselves to the scrutiny necessary to ensure this.

1.5     Openness

Holders of public office should act and take decisions in an open and transparent manner. Information should not be withheld from the public unless there are clear and lawful reasons for so doing.

1.6     Honesty

Holders of public office should be truthful.

1.7     Leadership

Holders of public office should exhibit these principles in their own behaviour and treat others with respect. They should actively promote and robustly support the principles and challenge poor behaviour wherever it occurs.

It’s time for things to change, we’d say..

Globalist, Medical, Political, Spiritual


This is a video link (for however long it lasts) to a Bitchute channel video, made by John O’Looney, who has been active for many months now, showing the dreadful cases he has had to deal with, as an undertaker in the Milton Keynes, Bucks UK area.

When a guy like this puts his head above the parapet he’s gonna get shot at, and, yes, he’s had some heavy criticism, mainly from others in his profession whose eyes are still wide shut.

Please SHARE this information, folks, we are in the midst of a Quiet War; I know I keep on saying it, but it is true, a long-planned operation – SILENT WEAPONS FOR QUIET WARS.

On a personal note – thanks to the many friends and fellow-fighters for their good wishes for this weekend – 80 – and yes, I can remember Ration Books..

grant andrew – Huddersfield