Autobiographical, Common Law, Political

FRODO vs SAURON – we can do it!

I have just finished my second affidavit, sent it off to the Crown and copied to all crown agents, confirming their tacit acceptance of all the details contained in the first affidavit, and the other supporting documentation, against which they did NOT object in the time-frame which I allowed them – 40 days.

There is a Latin phrase, so often used in THEIR legal arguments in their ‘courts’, which says ‘Qui tacet consentire videtur‘ – it translates as ‘(s)he who remains silent is deemed to be consenting’ 

In and among all the details of our first ‘complaint’, we are saying that we know that the LEGAL FICTION of our name, given to us at birth, all in CAPITAL letters, becomes treated as a ‘company’ or a ‘vessel’ and is unlawfully and illegally misrepresented as being ‘lost at sea’. They then go on to raise serious money and do thousands of other stock-market-type transactions, using YOUR TRUST name as collateral.

I am particularly happy in that I have kept, for 80 years, the original ‘NATIONAL REGISTRATION IDENTITY CARD’ given to my father when I was just FIVE days old. – see attached. Three days before, my birth certificate had been handed to him, where my given name appears in normal cursive handwriting, but the NRIC is immediately issued showing the name of a five-day-old infant in CAPITALS..

Using an old 200-year calendar, I have been able to be very specific, in my complaint to the Crown, that this card was issued on WEDNESDAY 5th August 1942.

(Some may remember the small magazine called ‘Old Moore’s Almanac‘, who originally published this very useful calendar: it enables us to pinpoint ANY date between the years 1850 to 2050 and tell us what ‘day of the week that was‘ Anyone who wants a copy can email and we will send out a pdf.)

Now, you may not be able to be so exact as I can, but you CAN state clearly the ACTUAL day of the week on which you were born and also the actual day on which your birth certificate was issued, which was the start of YOUR being given a LEGAL FICTION NAME. When dealing with these so-called ‘legal eagles’ they DO like to be fussy and very exact as to facts, so, let’s not disappoint them.

Don’t delay – act TODAY! Send us an email and we will send you the necessary documents, FREE OF CHARGE – we here at Livingstones do not think that FREEdom should be contaminated with PAYdom.
We send you the entire ‘complaint’ in PDF format, which gives you an idea of what is involved.

Next, send us a second email and we will send the SAME documents in EDITABLE format, so that you can put YOUR new ‘common law’ name in, change ‘man’ to read ‘woman’ etc.

Education, Medical, Tyrannical

HEY, LEAVE OUR KIDS ALONE!

At a time when the whole world realises that there is something not quite right about all this ‘jabbing’ frenzy, as even the UK’s ‘gov’ website is putting figures up about folks’ mutilations and mortality with this experimental liquid, WHY is it necessary to start jabbing 5 – 11 yr olds, who have the least risk of any of us, of dying from what has been proved to be nothing more than a nasty version of influenza.

My 8-yr old grandson came home from school last weekend, complete with A4 sheet, advising his parents to get him jabbed. The school leadership must have been a bit wary, as the offending Form was supported by four pages of advisory NOTES, from the Essex University, no less – extra GRAVITAS there, then. This is what went back to school with him today [Mon 21st Feb]

Grr!!!

Common Law, Constitutional, Financial, Globalist, Political

YOUR CORPORATION IS SHOWING!

The text here below is taken from a recent piece of research, where the writer is preparing to final disentangle himself from the web of deceit which masquerades as our ‘govern-ment’. Please, read this background explanation first, then, at the end, fasten your seatbelt, take two aspirins with a glass of water and get ready for a surprise.

The Background Conspiracy

“Personage and Barratry” This is what the lawyers, bankers, and politicians have used to enslave us.

GLOSSA: ~ Have you ever wondered why the SURNAME is often written using the ALL CAPITALS TEXT? (It’s called Glossa)

You are using a legal name, or a legal fiction and this is fraud. Understand that the name that you think is you, is actually split into separate entities. The ‘Christian’ name (Christ Name) and the Surname (slave-serf- name). When our parents register our birth (actually, they are informing on you) they probably believe it is a nice thing to do and they are proud of their new child so want the world to know. However, they register you (the child) and the names which they are giving you (given name) to the Crown Corporation LTD. as their Property by your Birth Certificate. You become literally the property of the Crown Corporation, a slave.

Back in the day, the nurse would prick the heel of the baby and then take a footprint of it using the baby’s own blood. They would also take the blood type to check to see if the baby was from their black bloodline. If it proved positive, then the baby would become ‘stillborn’. The footprint and the birth certificate (the real one, not the bit of paper you get) is then sent to the Vatican for storage. The storage of our souls.

Your birth certificate is also given a CUSIP or bond number. This bond is then traded on the stock exchange; you are literally ‘stock’ that is sold many times on the stock exchanges. Your actual physical value is also used as collateral (from the bond) allowing the United Kingdom LIMITED, a private limited company, and never a government, to take out loans from private banks such as the Bank of England. That bank is yet another private limited company and has nothing to do with England or a government.

Profit is made from you by the way of legal (not lawful) fines (from Legislation or Acts & Statutes), utility bills and many forms of taxation. In the early 70s the UNITED KINGDOM LIMITED took the backing of gold away from the British Pound and now the currency (fiat currency which is never money) is now backed not by Gold or Silver, but by your physical value or manpower or future sweat equity.

(This could be rectified tomorrow, if the ‘Bradbury’ Pound were reintroduced – see https://livingstones.blog for that one, and my thanks to John Weston Briggs for his excellent exposé of banking corruption).

When you are born, let’s say in England, you enter the ‘waters’ of the English jurisdiction. Your parents are in reality then informing England that a new ‘ship’ has entered their waters. When the birth certificate is completed by your parents (they were informants) the birth certificate creates an implied ‘company’ of you your SURNAME.

The birth certificate then tells UNITED KINGDOM LIMITED (a privately owned corporation and a different jurisdiction), that your ship (you, in fact) has entered their waters. All these implied corporations (you) and the UNITED KINGDOM LIMITED are considered ‘ships’ as we are all governed under the law of the sea, known as Admiralty or Maritime Law. There is no actual, real ‘ship’, but a document vessel, which in our case was our ‘Berth’ Certificate, created by the Doctor when they ‘docked’ you in the hospital WARD, making you a ward of the state (owned).

Next time you visit a graveyard, have a look at the names on the headstones. You will notice that they are all written in CAPITALS. These corporations are so greedy and so twisted, that they cannot let us go even after death.

Whenever you encounter any legal documents (remember, the document is your vessel) you will notice that your surname or sometimes all your names, just like the headstones in the graveyard are all written using ALL CAPITAL LETTERS. That is not English, it is LEGALESE.

This is all done on purpose and there are no coincidences. This way of theirs of writing with ALL CAPITAL LETTERS is not defined or recognised in The Oxford Styles Manual, which is the governing book of the English language. This means that although you may be able to read it as English, it is most definitely not English. The all CAPS or Gloss can be found within the ‘Oxford Styles Manual’, under foreign-languages, named ancient-Latin or sometimes Dog Latin.

You usually see the ALL CAPITALS or UPPERCASE text found as a language when writing in the American Sign Language (ASL). This is a signing language used for the deaf when written down. ASL can be defined in the book ‘The Chicago Manual of Style’ under the foreign languages header: American Sign Language (ASL) compound signs, 10.152 and ‘glosses, 10.147’. Thus, defining this text as a foreign language.

It also goes on to say that when written, it has no ‘one to one’ correspondence with any other languages on the document. The all CAPS or Gloss is also found in the Oxford Styles Manual under foreign-languages, namely Ancient Latin, however as the all-caps UK LTD is registered in Washington D.C, they appear to be using the ‘Chicago Manual of Style’, not the Oxford styles manual version.

Putting two or more languages onto a legal document is known in law as a ‘Glossa’. Black’s Law Dictionary defines: ‘GLOSSA’ – “It is a poisonous gloss which corrupts the essence of the text”. Meaning that by using the Glossa in a document they are trying to conceal or confuse the real facts. Just remember, we are talking about legal documents here, not lawful ones. We truly need to get our head around the difference between lawful and legal.

Go and have a check of any documents that are written within the legal realm, things like a driving licence, your passport, any fines or parking tickets, speeding tickets, court orders or a court summons. You will quickly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, all of the important stuff, like your name etc are all written in the ALL UPPERCASE or CAPITALS style language.

As we established earlier, the ALL UPPERCASE and or CAPITALS text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another, they are simply not compatible. It is like writing half English and halb-Deutsch.

So, the way to read it is, you must read all the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALL UPPERCASE.

When read like this, you will quickly realise that these court orders, council tax demands, speeding tickets and all other legal documents make no sense whatsoever.

They can only make sense when we assume that it is all plain English and we read it like that, once you take one away from the other it renders the document useless.

Since the UK government is not actually a government but simply a privately owned corporation it can only communicate, impose fines and set legislation, acts and statutes, upon other corporations.

They then trick us into registering our names as a corporate entity with our driving licences and passports, then, in turn, trick us into thinking that those names are physically us. It successfully gets us to represent the corporately registered name and therefore bear the burden of those fines, tickets, and policies. This is a crime known as personage or sometimes known as legal entrapment.

Hand in hand with the crime of personage or legal entrapment is another criminal activity known by the term barratry which is knowingly bringing false claims into court. This is what police, politicians, judges and local councils are doing every day.

Consider the birth certificate, it has two names, your given name (Christ name) but also the surname which is not even yours. It also has two dates on it, your berth date (when the docker BERTHED you in the DOCK) and two languages, some in English and some in GLOSSA. This could only be done this way to confuse and trick you.

Every ACT of Parliament is directed at a PERSON or PERSONS. The Bills of Exchange Act 1882, Section 2, defines the word ‘person’, as does the Local Government Act 1888, Section 100; and Interpretation Act 1978, Schedule 1, “Words and expressions defined”; and Representation of the People Act 1983, Section 202, ‘General provisions as to interpretation’.

So, in reality, a person is not what we think it is. It is in fact an ‘association’ corporate or unincorporate [a ‘voter’ is a person]. A person is not a man, male or female (Genesis 1:27).

Man is the creation of God. A Person or human, human being, etc. is an invention of man. Hue, means colour, so a HUMAN is only the colour of man, not a man:

This entire fake system has been designed for centuries as a commercial enterprise. We are being used as ‘persons in commerce’. The bills, the fines, the taxes are all directed NOT at us but rather at our legal fiction, sometimes referred to as our strawman.

To avoid this fraud and to not allow them to commit the crimes of legal entrapment on us we need to comprehend that we are man: and woman: not a person or persons and we have no CAPITALISED NAMES.

However, when we are presented with these fake bills, taxes and fines, never refuse to pay them because that will only cause controversy, and the legal society thrive and prosper purely on the creation of controversy. By removing any controversy or argument, there is nothing for a judge or magistrate to deal with.

It is simply commerce to the legal society, just business, like when the Godfather shoots his enemies, just business.

The easiest way to deal with this fraud is to always realize that the bills, fines etc are simply offers to contract. If you contract, then you have to pay. But rather than contracting, send them a counteroffer by way of a conditional acceptance. You then agree to pay any and all bills, fines, taxes etc in full only upon receipt of a lawful contract; a commercial true bill and a full and complete statement of accounts.

For clarity, a lawful contract must include full disclosure with nothing added or removed after being signed, consideration, (meaning that both parties bring something to the table and all signatories get what they want from the contract), lawful terms and conditions laid out in simple English, plus the wet signatures of all contracting parties.

For your information the word ‘sign’ has a silent ‘G’ [that is a Masonic letter] so, when one is signing, one is sinning. The original sin is the one our parents signed on a birth certificate bearing the name they gave you and the surname added by the State, handing over title and ownership of the name one is given. You are then property of the Crown Corporation.

More Evidence

Just in case you thought we were making all this stuff up, or even exaggerating, let me introduce you to the Global Market Entity Identifier [GMEI]. There is a Belgian corporation called Business Entity Data (BED) B.V., itself a subsidiary of The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC). The former operates the GMEI legal entity identifier solution within the federated Global LEI system [GLEIS].

Go search online for yourself – go to – gmeiutility.org -which will take you to a black page with white lettering.

At the top right-hand end of the header bar, you will see a tiny ‘magnifying glass’ icon.

Click on there to get a small drop-down box, into which you merely need to enter your National Insurance number – thus [AB 12 34 56 C] – you leave the usual spaces between the items.

When you click on there, you should get a ‘landscape’ page, actually, many pages, which is a list of EVERY single time that YOU, as a ‘commodity’ have been used by the various government bodies (and lord knows who else?) in trade, investment and borrowing (International Monetary Fund – [IMF], Bank of International Settlements [BIS], etc). since the day your parents registered you. What a very cunning plot, and so long, so subtly embedded in the minds of every generation, to simply trot along and *REGIS-TER your beautiful new-born as a vessel on the seas of commerce.

For me, I have to date been traded 861,489 times, but then, I am in my 80th year now.

  • Regis is from the Latin for ‘king’ – rex – regis, so we are all putting ourselves under the yoke when we ‘register’ for things.

Talk about ‘hidden in plain sight’ and ‘always read the small print’

No doubt others might be interested to know how we have all been abused for generations. Feel free to share this item.

As usual, attached here in pdf if needed –

Sincerely yours –

grant andrew of the livingstone smith family – Huddersfield                19.02.2022

Common Law, Constitutional, Democracy, Medical, Political

GRAND JURY PREPARATION & MODEL

This is the full version [1hr 28mins] of the video from which an extract was released earlier this week.

It is clear that Reiner Fuellmich (and Viviane Fischer) have realised that the United States Grand Jury will ALSO now be under the control of a Democratic Party, which is in league with the WEF-controlled United Nations, and therefore they now open their investigations to world public scrutiny. The truth needs no cloak.

Those of us who know Fullmich’s pedigree can be sure that he is not the type to be side-lined or brow-beaten into silence, having successfully confronted and exposed both industrial and financial criminality (Volkswagen Group and Deutsche Bank).

We recommend this lengthy but very significant recording for your serious consideration. You will know how to read this:

http : / / odysee dot com / @ Banned You Tube Videos : 4 / Grand – Jury – Day – 1:2

It is set out here as the first of a series of public hearings, to show beyond reasonable doubt that there has been a long-planned scheme to deceive the common wo/man and gain illicit control of society.

It is intended that the subsequent weekly hearings will also be made fully public since the truth needs no protection from scrutiny.

Let us all unite in the prayer that this brave work will not now be scuppered by the black hearts. We note that one of the nominated witnesses – Dr Luc Montagnier – is reported to have died recently (since February 6th)

12 February 2022

Published with grateful thanks to our fellow-warrior [PD] who brought this to our attention

Globalist, Medical, Political

MAC addresses found in vaxed people

Luis Miguel De Benito, a digestive physician with a PhD in molecular biology, has recorded an excerpt of an experiment he conducted which has found what would appear to be mysterious MAC addresses detected in vaccinated individuals with Bluetooth applications.

Although it may sound very futuristic, we have heard from Klaus Schwab, founder, and chairman of The World Economic Forum (WEF), that humans beings will soon receive a chip in their body in order to merge with the digital world, this was recorded in an interview with Swiss channel RTS on the 10th January 2016.

In the same interview, he was asked when there would be implantable chips, Schwab replied, “certainly in the next ten years, first, we will wear them in our clothes, and then we could imagine that we will implant them in our brains or on our skin.

Klaus Schwab

Schwab, designer, and promoter of The Great Reset  he is also the guy we have  repeatedly heard saying that “COVID -19 is “a rare but narrow window of opportunity to rethink, reinvent, reset our world.”

This “Window of opportunity” was created through the construction of the plandemic, which has essentially been a Trojan horse used to usher in Schwab’s plans.

Schwab also revealed that “in the end, maybe there will be a direct communication between our brain and the digital world. what we see is a kind of fusion of the physical, digital and biological world

Dr Benito’s findings from his experiment conducted in the summer of 2021, could suggest that Schwab’s plans for this fusion, may have already come to fruition through COVID gene therapy injections, which according to Benito, appear to install a MAC address inside individuals who have taken the jab.

The video recording will be linked at the end of this article, however, I have written out a transcript of the recording just below.

Dr. Luis Benito

The Dr Luis Benito Recording Transcript

“I’m going to tell you today the findings of this

summer, which go along the lines of what

may be behind all this attempt to vaccinate.

Why so much interest in jabbing? What’s the reason? I’m going to tell you.

The international organizations that are also investigating this matter asked me for a brief report on what I had done during the summer and I’m going to going to read it to you as it is.

 I’m going to make glosses of what I’m saying, but this is what I’ve written to them and the different teams that are investigating this are seeing what part of it is right and what part is not.

They’re translating it into several languages, I say this because, probably, by the 31st it’s going to be made public in other places or whatever.

It’s been hard for me to get here to read it. Do you know why? Because it does weigh a little bit the fact of taking out of the medical issue.

All this, you know, started as a channel to discuss the evolution of the pandemic, the affected, the treatments, the virus, how the ICUs were, well, and this no longer makes sense.

All that’s part of the past. And now, what we’re going to is a recognition of a desire, on the part of the authorities, to take away freedoms from human beings.

I don’t care whether you think I’m raving or not, but as I have a moral obligation to report what I have done, I tell you today, and whoever wants to believe it will believe it, and whoever doesn’t will judge, criticize and compare it.

As I say, I’ve written it, and I have already sent it to the teams that are studying this subject in different parts of the world.

“If from the medical point of view there’s no need to administer any preventive measure for a disease with the lethality of 2 per 1,000, why so much insistence that everyone should be inoculated?

What’s the vaccine going to give me that I don’t already have? Well, this experiment arose from this reflection.

Although there were many consultations, during the summer of 2021, in the afternoons, I was the only operative. There wasn’t even administrative staff in the afternoons in that building.

“Under my office, I occasionally parked an ambulance from SUMA, from the emergency service, because they have a base there. Those were the only “interferences” I detected. Most of the observations were carried out without that artifact. I started the consultation at 15:00 and had patients listed every 20 minutes.

Due to COVID measures, it was recommended that they come alone and, if possible, at the appointed time. Not before or after, before starting the consultation, I’d connect the Bluetooth application on my cell phone and invariably check that there was no device available to contact, there was no electronic device in range to connect to.

When a patient appeared, often already up the stairs or at the beginning of the corridor, about 20 meters away from the practice, on my cell phone, I could see if one or two devices to connect to with Bluetooth appeared, one or two or none.

On my phone, I could check to see if the Bluetooth was detecting something or nothing and if it was something, it was a device with a MAC Address (Media Access Control) code. This is a unique identifier that electronic device manufacturers assign to a card or item that can be networked.

After attending to the patient’s medical requirements, I’d ask him whether or not he had been vaccinated for COVID. If the answer was affirmative, it was usually quick and without hesitation and if it was negative, it was often accompanied by a certain wariness, if not anger at the question.

“A reaction that explained to me that, in general, those who hadn’t wanted to be vaccinated had been subjected to some kind of adverse social situation. After reassuring the patient, whatever his response, I’d write down on a sheet of paper the answer he gave me.

None of the 137 patients I asked refused to answer, If the answer was affirmative, I’d ask them what type of vaccine they had received, when, and if they had had any adverse reactions.

 I’d then ask them if they had any cell phones or electronic devices such as wireless headsets or tablets on them, and if so, I’d ask them to turn it off for a moment. When they turned it off, on my cell phone, usually, one of the devices that registered to Bluetooth would disappear.

Out of hundreds Here are the results.

Of the 137 patients questioned, 112 said they had been vaccinated, and 25 said they hadn’t been vaccinated.

None of the patients who said they hadn’t been vaccinated registered on my cell phone any device available for Bluetooth connection, having ensured the disconnection of their cell phone, if they had one.

In 96 patients of the 112 who said they had been vaccinated, 96 of the 112, having switched off their electronic devices if they were carrying them, a MAC code remained on the screen of my cell phone, which I had already noted in my notes next to the patient’s medical history.

Source

I interpreted that it was a code that the patient himself was carrying and that, in fact, when he left the office, leaving the building, it disappeared from my cell phone.

With this simple observation throughout July and August, I’ve been able to verify that 100% of the patients who say they aren’t vaccinated don’t raise any contact device with my cell phone via Bluetooth. But 86% of those who said they were vaccinated generated a MAC Address on my cell phone.

“These are the observations made, and many doubts and questions arise from them, among them, the ones that seem to me be the most significant are

First: Does the signal detected on my cell phone come from the vaccinated person? Well, precisely the isolated environment and not being interfered with by other signals has meant that there’s no other possible source of contamination.

In fact, when the SUMA ambulance arrived, apart from other devices such as “SUMA base” and several MAC addresses that I attributed to ambulance personnel who could be vaccinated, I noticed that these signals disappeared when the ambulance left.

And when there were suspicions about whether there was some other distorting element, for example, patients’ escorts in the corridor, accidental operators in the corridor that could be the source or origin of other markers, then I dismissed that case. It is not within the 137 that I have confirmed.

Second: Do all cell phones detect Bluetooth devices with equal capability? My answer is no. My experience is that they don’t.

Third: Does the detectable MAC Address on a person allow interaction with him? To what extent? At least I’m sure of one thing: it allows me to know where he is because I knew that someone vaccinated was coming to my office, before he showed up.

The fourth question I asked myself: If the MAC Address is something personal, individual, and unrepeatable, how is it possible that the five people who were injected with the contents of the same vial, from the same distribution of the same batch, don’t have 5 different MAC Addresses?

“Well, I consulted with some computer technicians, roboticists and fellow biologists and engineers, experts in computer science, and nanorobotics. And they advocate the possibility that this code is generated as a result of the interaction of what’s injected with the genetic material of the patient.

Perhaps not so much with their DNA, as with the larger compatibility complex, the HLA’s, which are ultimately derived from the genome.

“If the MAC address is generated by the vaccine, why do only 86% of those who claim to be vaccinated have it? Different answers have been considered to answer this question.

  1. Some of the vials could be placebo.
  2. Some vials could be denatured.
  3. A lack of response. In other words, the expected results are not always obtained when a product is applied.
  4. Which seems very important to me, is because the patient lies and says he is vaccinated when he isn’t to avoid problems or controversies.

I have many doubts. These are the findings that I’ve made. They’re outside my medical knowledge. I simply attest that when you’re in consultation with a person in an isolated environment, that comes up on my cell phone.

What does it mean? I have no idea. But I don’t like it.”

With a hat-tip to Patricia Harrity for this report, first published in

‘The Daily Expose’ on Saturday 29th December 2021