For when your boss tells you “It’s mandatory”.

Care home staff…  [ That means ANYBODY and EVERYBODY ]

This is what you do.

You just say no!

Boss, “you must get the injection to protect the residents.”

You, “no, my responsibility is to protect myself first, not the residents.”

Boss, “but you have to, to protect the residents, it’s safe enough” – (no it isn’t)!

You, “no, it is a Medical treatment, an experimental one at that, which comes with a risk of anything from sickness to disablement and death, with no long-term safety data as this is the trials. I am not taking the risk with my life to protect a resident.”

Boss, “it’s policy now.”

You, “your policy breaks human rights laws, employment laws, disability discrimination laws, the equality act, and a lot more. Health and safety is above policy, you are not considering my safety in this”

Boss, “but the Government have mandated it”

You, “mandatory is not law, it is a statutory instrument which operates on the basis of consent, the ‘mandate’ breaks the law and I do not consent.

Should anything happen to me, the Government holds no liability, but you do, you need to check that your insurance covers my claim against you if I am injured or die as a result of you forcing an experimental medical treatment onto me.”

Boss, “or you’ll have to leave the position.”

You, “I won’t quit I know the law and I know my rights, you’ll have to fire me and then I’ll take legal action against you for unfair dismissal and a handful of other offences you’ve already just committed by trying to coerce and threaten me with the loss of my job”.

Boss,…… (Quite probably stumped at this point so not saying a lot).

You, “and I am putting you on notice now that if you press this issue again, harass me about it, discriminate against me for it, cause me alarm and distress as you’re already doing, I will take legal action against you.”

Boss,… (Your guess is as good as mine as to what will be said here but your final words should be)

You, “so we are clear on my stance about this then, yes? Good, now, let’s get back to work!”



Doctors for Covid Ethics has written three open letters to the European Medicines Agency regarding COVID-19 vaccine dangers. In those letters we have insisted upon evidence that risks of clotting, bleeding and platelet abnormalities were appropriately ruled out in legitimate empirical trials prior to human use. We foresaw deaths and harm from clotting, warning of these dangers before blood clots led to vaccine suspensions around the world.

The first letter, emailed February 28 and hand-delivered March 1st, can be found here. The EMA’s reply of March 23rd can be found here, and our rebuttal letter, of April 1st, here, all summarised in a press release here. Our most recent letter, warning that “cardinal symptoms of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) dominate the list of adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccines” is here.

All this for a disease which is not even scientifically PROVEN to exist – has never been fully investigated, and from which, whatever they think it is, over 98% of patients (Latin – to suffer) are recovering, without the need of graphene oxide injections.

As if in the nick of time, along came the untested, unproven ‘miracle’ solution. The UK PM hails it as the panacea – you’ll soon be able to get on those beaches again, folks – and the unthinking hordes are queuing to have their genes altered for all time.

After the recent shenanigans of the former Secretary of State for Health & Social ‘Care’ I am having the greatest difficulty in hearing any more about this charade.

For the full story on protests from REAL medical professionals, who’ve got their heads screwed on the right way round – go to:

Urgent Open Letter from Doctors and Scientists to the European Medicines Agency regarding COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Concerns – Doctors for COVID Ethics (doctors4covidethics.org)




We have reached a time in the era shift where living men and women no longer hold any confidence in so called ‘authority’. Many of us have concerns that medical procedures will be forced on those in the public realm who engage in commerce.

The ideas we cover here outline law versus legal ideas to show how we got to where we are, and how to protect against unwanted medical intrusions.

This all comes down to who has a ‘legitimate’ [LAWFUL – DAMNED LATIN GETS EVERYWHERE] claim on your body, which on the face of it is an illegitimate idea. Has the time come to make a claim on what is already yours? Has the legal system gone so far off the rails?

Most probably, yes, but simply holding your position and understanding a few things will go a long way in protecting your genetic makeup and illegitimate claims on your body.

Living men and women are not subject to statutory policy – but – to a higher power.