Here is a woman telling of her ordeal in a Texas hospital, of the methods being used to force suffering souls into obedience to the ‘pandemic’ narrative, and the strength of her man to get her out of the place..
I was personally placed in a very similar position back in November 2020. At 2 am , going back into the kitchen at home to put a tumbler into the sink, I was the one who took a tumble – flat on my face, nose bleeding, head thrown back in whiplash. Thinking I had damaged a vertebra in my neck, unable to lie flat without pain, I reluctantly called for some ‘help’.
Arriving at the local NHS hospital by ambulance at 2.45am, the first thing I had to do was to submit to a ‘test’ to see whether I had contracted the ‘Black Death‘ or not. Which I refused. After having two successive x-rays, which proved that, in fact, all I had was whiplash – nothing fractured, I was informed, “We’ll put you on Ward 1 for a couple of days, to sort out any dietary issues, but you WILL have to have the PCR test before you can go on the ward.”
When I refused for the third time, the doctor was on their side of the curtain, joking with his colleagues that “we’ve got a right conspiracy theorist in there“, at which I got off the examination couch, left via the ‘public side’, rang for a taxi and was back home before they had even missed me.
Thirty minutes later, two paramedics were banging on the door – because I had left a canula in my arm, they said – (removed on the way home). After 15 minutes they departed. .Eleven months later, when undergoing a routine trial test examination by an acupuncturist friend, I was found to have been walking around for all those months with ‘a bleed on the brain’ – x-rayed twice in a hospital, no-one spotted that.
I DO wonder what the outcome might have been, had I submitted like a little lamb to those NHS protocols.. Almost two years on and, apart from the hypotension, which has been a lifelong companion, the gods are still being kind to me and keeping me in the ‘Quiet War – see SWFQW (qv on here) for details.
Have you seen the notice, posted this morning on Go-ogle, that if you buy ‘petrol’ (and we assume that this must also apply to ‘diesel’) for any purpose at all, you will, if paying by Visa card, have a ‘Holding charge’ debited to your account?
Apparently, this is precautionary by the suppliers, because some folks are so desperate to stay mobile that they are vastly exceeding their card limit. No doubt the rest of the card sharks will follow suit. So, use CASH whilst you still can, folks, the net is tightening..
Let’s say we are designing a product, which will help the emergency services when dealing with a suspected case of poisoning, or a serum which will be a groundbreaking treatment for many cancerous tumours. We’ve spent the past several years in patient research and development, and finally, there it is, ready to be publicized, mass-produced to the undoubted improvement of society worldwide. However, before we release our brainchild, we decide to DESTROY all the tools which helped create it, burn all the blueprint papers, make a ‘Luddite’ attack on all the supporting hardware.. Well, as we unkindly used to say in childhood, “they’ll be coming for thee, them fellers in white coats, tha’ll be off in’t green van!” – because, well, no one in their right mind would be so stupid, so selfish as to do that, would they?? Yet, guess what, someone has developed a new software communication system which they’ve released to zillions of mobile phone users, and apparently it’s so good that we all can contact anyone, anywhere, night or day, discuss all matters, private, personal, public , perfidious or political – and, not only is it FREE, best of all, it’s ‘encrypted‘! That means, no one can listen in, copy or record what goes on between us and our contacts. However, we might just switch our phones on early one morning, in our local time, to find that what we have just discussed, like a modern day ‘Luddite’, with our co-conspirators, is being ‘backed up’ – for our safety and security, of course, by some shadowy corporation which goes under the pseudonym – what is it again? Ah yes, go-ogle. Pass me my toilet bag, the green van’s just pulling up at our front door..
Here is an example of how ‘masons’ work. Those of us who value the natural, common law have a built-in sensor: we can sense, almost smell, when there is something unhealthy going on among those who think they were born with the authority to lead the sheeple astray.
We make no apology for quoting, now and then, from the book on which her Britannic Majesty, on June 2 1953, solemnly undertook to lead and defend our national (and international) identity:
and there are several references in both the Old and the New Covenant writings to a stone having been ‘cut out of the mountain without hands’ which, when the leaders of the day came up against it, would ‘break them in pieces’ but which, if, having been confronted with it, they chose to disregard it, would drop on them and ‘grind them to dust’ – which seems to us to be a clear reminder about being truthful and humble when you are the ones, selected, after all, by the sovereign people, to occupy the ‘hot’ seats, you had best keep in mind the ‘Nolan Principles’ – (see the end of this article).
If you refer back to our blog site, you’ll read how the present ‘leaders’ are grossly failing in their duty to carry out Her Majesty’s solemn promise:
Being a common barrator was an offence under the common law of England. It was classified as a misdemeanour. It consisted of “persistently stirring up quarrels in the Courts or out of them”. It is uncertain whether, in the ordinary way, persons charged with commission of the offence were dealt with by indictment.[4]
In 1966, the Law Commission recommended for the offence to be abolished.[5] It said that there had been no indictments for this offence for “many years” and that, as an indictable misdemeanour, it was “wholly obsolete”.[4] Its recommendation was implemented by the Criminal Law Act 1967.
In Scots law, barratry referred to the crime committed by a judge who is induced by bribery to pronounce judgment….
The up-to-date situation is that the ‘Tories’ are trying to push through the system a ‘Human Rights Reform Bill’ which will also chip another piece off the Common Law – by ‘abolish(ing) the common law offence of ‘riot’, so, it would seem that shortly, we shall even be in trouble for getting upset about the fact that ‘they’ are planning to stop the sheeple even getting out of the ‘pen’, let alone start thinking for ourselves.
Appendix:
The Nolan Principles – Seven Principles for service in the public interest
1. The Seven Principles of Public Life
The Seven Principles of Public Life (also known as the Nolan Principles) apply to anyone who works as a public office-holder. This includes all those who are elected or appointed to public office, nationally and locally, and all people appointed to work in the Civil Service, local government, the police, courts and probation services, non-departmental public bodies (NDPBs), and in the health, education, social and care services. All public office-holders are both servants of the public and stewards of public resources. The principles also apply to all those in other sectors delivering public services.
1.1 Selflessness
Holders of public office should act solely in terms of the public interest.
1.2 Integrity
Holders of public office must avoid placing themselves under any obligation to people or organizations that might try inappropriately to influence them in their work. They should not act or take decisions in order to gain financial or other material benefits for themselves, their family, or their friends. They must declare and resolve any interests and relationships.
1.3 Objectivity
Holders of public office must act and take decisions impartially, fairly and on merit, using the best evidence and without discrimination or bias.
1.4 Accountability
Holders of public office are accountable to the public for their decisions and actions and must submit themselves to the scrutiny necessary to ensure this.
1.5 Openness
Holders of public office should act and take decisions in an open and transparent manner. Information should not be withheld from the public unless there are clear and lawful reasons for so doing.
1.6 Honesty
Holders of public office should be truthful.
1.7 Leadership
Holders of public office should exhibit these principles in their own behaviour and treat others with respect. They should actively promote and robustly support the principles and challenge poor behaviour wherever it occurs.
LIVING STONES 