Category: Political

Political

Truth – the sharpest scalpel!

Andrew Livingstone

If the online activity of the past four years is to be trusted, there is no doubt that President Donald J Trump has been consistently ruffling a lot of democratic feathers across the pond. Well, what did they expect, when the nation voted in a business man rather than a politician? Right from the day he declared that he wanted to “go see Rocket-Man” I could see that we were going to be in for something special.

Today, we have confirmation from a Dr Steve Pieczenik, who has been authorized to make a public statement, confirming what was circulating last week, that there have been serious shenanigans going on at the polling stations running up to the election on November 3rd across the USA. There can surely be no clearer announcement than this, that evidence is appearing which will send many people to jail for their part in this democrat fiasco. Please see the attached video, issued on Friday 6th November 2020

https://brandnewtube.com/watch/trump-039-s-election-sting-operation_Os7C58T3KerszWo.html

It seems that there is a g-d in heaven after all..

Political

Specialists – in generalising?

Andrew Livingstone

Re-posted with a hat-tip to ‘The Slog’

“Vallance and Whitty’s ordeal at the hands of the Science and Technology sub-committee may have seemed to the untrained eye like a dull affair, but it was riddled with clear evidence of contradiction and amateurism.

Both men were forced to accept some startling things. Whether many of our MPs will spot them is another matter, but I at least shall record them here.

The most remarkable fact to emerge was what both witnesses agreed was “the very low level of infection transmitted outdoors”. The answer was given in response to a question about inter-school football games being cancelled; but the ramifications of it are mind-blowing.

One of the very few things I have accepted since the February 2020 period about Covid19 is that is has been billed by almost all experts as ‘fifteen times more infectious than influenza‘.

Are these self-styled science-promoters now telling us that this is wrong? And if outdoors is not the main source of infection, then research does indeed suggest that the only other place is indoors.

So why are we being locked down in the one environment where (it now seems) Covid spreads with consummate ease?

Another breathtaking admission came from Sir Mark Vallance a few minutes minutes later, when he said, “we don’t actually know the NHS’s bed capacity, because that is their modelling copyright”. Yet these are the team leaders who gave the media earlier this week an exact date – December 4th – when the NHS would ‘run out of bed capacity’. So how on earth could they know that?

I saw little evidence of any reputation-seeking legislator pressing the Dubious Duo on either of these points.

Vallance came across as far more dismissive of attacks based on what he seemed to see as low-level detail. He observed, “Look, we’re not being asked to know every stat on outdoor tranmission” and Whitty nodded, adding “Scientific investigation is not a yes-no thing”.

Well guys, trust me: ‘Full up by December 4th” is a yes-no thing.

Meanwhile, Chris Whitty made several attempts to excuse himself on the basis of modelling being an inexact science….and sound almost humble in his realisation of model shortcomings. In doing so, he managed only to come across as casual – even sloppy – in his use of the words ‘might’, ‘could’, ‘theoretically’, ‘imponderables’ and ‘likelihoods’.

What these two very senior advisers are in the business of doing is making futurology look and sound like science. In fact – certainly based on my own professional experience of models – it’s quackery.

Sir Mark Vallance really gave the game away by saying, “What five organisations have done is model outcomes against a series of assumptions”.

All of them gave a different answer – imagine that? – and thus, they took a mean number. Presenting this as a bona fide conclusion is not science in any shape or form: it’s an illusionist’s card trick.

The fundamental weakness of models is the flaw in one or more of their assumptions. It’s why all the climate models are wrong, and why Neil Ferguson has been so wildly wrong four times in a row over eighteen years….and has cost the country some £28 billion.

The ham-fisted alchemy of it all went on and on. Sir Mark conceded that the models didn’t factor in all of the data about the new 3-tiered system – a system he and his colleagues dismissed at the time as “woefully insufficient” – but which today Chris Whitty was forced to accept may well have had a positive effect.

Whitty blithely went on to tell committee members (via absurd video-distancing links) that “reaching the peak which we reached in April strikes me as an entirely realistic situation” for the new models to project. Nobody asked the question how he could say that, given the titanic difference in alleged Co-Vid 19 death levels between September/October and the March/April period.

In truth, all the hearings did was confirm what somewhere between 14 and 18% of us have felt since the outset of Contrick19: as a subject of risible hype, it remains unequalled in the annals of historical attempts to churn out nonsense apart from (perhaps) the Rastafarian drivel insisting during the 1970s that Haile Selassi would live forever.

The wooden Coronavirus narrative is riddled with the worm of cognitive dissonance, of “facts” changing from week to week, of counterintuitive insistence, and the blasé rejection of everything we have ever learned about natural resistance.

The simplest example of this is The Mask. See if you can keep a straight face as I unveil a simple piece of logic on the basis of “you can’t have it every which way at once”.

“Masks don’t protect you much” >> “Masks are vital if you want to protect yourself outdoors” >> “Masks work” >> “Most infection doesn’t take place outdoors” >> “If you’re vulnerable, stay at home because Masks alone aren’t enough to protect you”.

Let’s wait and see what Parliament makes of the ‘evidence’ we heard today. Just don’t get your hopes up.

Common Law, Democracy, Political

Weh dem, der aus der Reihe tanzt**!

Andrew Livingstone

How many of us knew that Obergruppenfuehrerin Merkel was actually born Victoria Kastner – in the USA? Nothing these days is ever quite what it appears to be at first glance.

In truth, I am less interested in her than I am in the New World (Dis)Order of which she is just one of the many pawns on the board. What to do about it all?

We now have a police service more interested in what we British sheeple are thinking, rather than concentrating on their historical (since Sir Robert Peel – 1829) role, viz:

“The primary object of an efficient police is the preservation of life and property and the prevention of crime”

The primary object of today’s police is now bordering on the Orwellian Room 101 (if you don’t comply we’ll let rats eat out your eyes) mindset.

All of us, uninvited immigrants, as well as polite septuagenarians who can remember Ration Books, are walking around with coinage in our pocket, every piece carrying the image of our Sovereign Lady, plus the pledge, which she made, back in 1952,

Dei Gratia (D,.G.) by the grace of g-d (let’s not offend anyone here)

Fidei Defensor (F.D.) – defender of the Faith – the right to believe, (if you find that easier)

yet we hear that it is ‘offensive’ or ‘inciteful of racial tension’ should a follower of the resurrected Messiah (= R.C. – Jesus) dare to stand on a public street and read aloud from his Bible. However, if you are an Islamite, it is tolerated that you go around randomly stabbing people, whilst screaming out that ‘Allah is the greatest’ – just because we don’t happen to share the same view of g-d as the Prophet would have it.

Either way, Jo and Joe Public are now being straight-jacketed, told what to think, what to say, where (and where not) to say it, all against a backdrop of egotistical Tory treason, where the only place in which Democracy survives intact is – the Cabinet Room.

Here is today’s example, (with a hat-tip to the DFLA) and published online, thanks to the courage and determination of the editors at Kipper Central..

Editors Note: Facebook have continually censored this post.

“I guess, like me, you will have heard of the case involving Tommy Robinson. Not just Tommy of course, R B Inman, Darrell Goodliffe etc who have all had their Facebook pages taken down.

Other groups have also been taken down. It seems we are entering into a new a dark era in the history of our country.

The darkness is that of the Silencing of speech, the Silencing of communication. There is a reason behind this.

THE WAR IS DECLARED AND BATTLE HAS COME DOWN.

This has been a peculiar week for those of us involved in the struggle to keep our nation afloat. (This is not an elitist article, if you are reading this you are involved in that struggle and I count you as a fellow soldier.)

From the Labour Party and Corbyn announcing he is wanting a second referendum to the formation of an undemocratic political party in the Houses of Parliament. (Did anyone vote this new party into place?) From worrying signals of Brexit not being carried through to the exposè of the criminals behind Panorama to the closing down of TR and company on FB and Twitter, something tells me they are all linked.

TAKE OFF THE HEAD THE BODY WILL DIE.

For me this is textbook tactics taking place. Those who have military experience will understand straight away.

If you go to war you can paralyse the enemy effectively by taking out the leaders, then communications. The enemy can then be dealt with in a piecemeal fashion.

Are we seeing this happen as we speak? Leaders taken out, groups taken down. There can be no denying that this has happened. The question is why. Why now, when there are ominous warnings about Brexit, when our government are turning their back on the people, when the EU are insulting the English people in ever growing malice.

FREEDOM OF SPEECH IS ESSENTIAL.

Communication is the key to any idea, to any movement. If you stop people communicating you have a free ride and can rule in peace.

Over the years we have seen politicians clamp down on free speech. They have done this in many ways: Sexism, racism, hate crime, hate speech, Islamophobic, homophobia, femophobia political correctness. Then when Facebook came along, it all went on line. People thought they could speak freely. Not a bit of it. Cyber police, online crime hub, censorship.

Just why is it if I say something on line I get the police doing a raid (Trust me, 12 coppers at 6am for me saying that Corbyn and Fascism are the same and quoting a speech from Hitler to prove it) when 20 miles down the road over 200 girls under 16 are being raped by Muslim rape Gangs and nothing is done.

You explain.

No, the facts are there. Freedom of speech is being removed.

WHY REMOVE THE RIGHT?

Throughout history freedom of speech has been an essential part of any race and its development. Freedom of speech has been the prerequisite of all idea and expression. Without freedom of speech there would be no art, no music, no film, no Facebook, no pyramids, no Eiffel Tower, no London Bridge, Stonehenge, football, cricket, theory of evolution. You name anything and it only became possible through freedom of speech.

Without freedom of speech there would be no moon landings, no flight, no science, philosophy, exploration, cures in medicine, romance, drama, all would be gone.

According to Liberties International, “Some EU governments are not respecting freedom of speech. Some of them put pressure on public service media to report in a way that is biased in favour of the government.”

You want to tell me the BBC or Facebook are not undergoing this pressure?

FREEDOM OF SPEECH IS ESSENTIAL

Without freedom of speech there can be no functioning of society, there can be no democracy. Galile Galileo was placed under house arrest and described as an insane heretic in his day. Yet now he is considered the father between philosophy and Modern science. There are many cases of this nature, from Martin Luther King who challenged and threatened the modern society of his time. Can you imagine if America had treated him the way our Government and media treat Tommy Robinson?

Imagine everything that we would miss out on, the years it would have set us back in terms of progression?

I am no direct fan of Tommy Robinson. I respect the guy and admire his courage but it is plain to see that if you criticise the religion of Islam you are labeled as a racist or Islamophobe, there is no middle ground. Indeed people have died at the hands of the followers of this religion for being critical.

Any views that challenge the current political stranglehold are not allowed and you will instantly be shouted down and again labeled as racist etc…… Say anything that contradicts Labour or Conservative or that is critical of the system and again you are right wing.

Your words are watched daily, your actions monitored on CCTV. You are only one step away from being locked up.

Criticise Khan on crime, you are racist, criticise Muslim rape gangs, you are racist.

Your opponents cannot debate, they cannot rationalise, they merely shout and use slogans, why?

Because they have lost the ability to use freedom of speech.

When we lose the ability to debate, we lose the ability to reason and thus the ability to use free speech.

LOSE FREEDOM OF SPEECH YOU RETARD SOCIETY.

It is only too obvious that society as a whole, can only function when allowed to practice freedom of speech.

Now Freedom of speech does not give you the right to insult. As Plato stated: “When one resorts to insults one had lost the debate already”

This is something I agree with. However When speaking out against politics or religion, are you insulting an individual or the political belief?

An insult on a belief is not a personal insult, I wish people could tell the difference! In today’s society they cannot. They do not get the logic of debate or the understanding of cut and thrust in debate.

If we take today’s society and apply its logic what would we have?

Well based on Tommy Robinson Lenin would be called a racist: “Religion is the opiate of the masses”

Well that is hate speech. Saying that Islam is a drug that enslaves people and will kill them is hateful and Islamophobic.

But no, What Lenin said is OK, as long as you apply it to Christianity.

Karl Marx said that mankind will only be free when it emancipates itself from the jew.

(Hitler called this final solution).

This is hate speech. Yet millions follow this line of thinking.

Jeremy Corbyn who gave money to a holocaust denier, friends with Hamas etc…. Well, he has not got into trouble has he?

MAY YOU LIVE IN INTERESTING TIMES.

This is a Chinese curse. It is always the interesting times that cause the most difficult lives in history.

In a week where a black Christian preacher was arrested but Muslims praying on London Bridge (Scene of a violent terrorist attack) were not arrested at all despite seizing up traffic. In a week where a political party is formed to go against the Democratic rights of the people, in a week where Corbyn calls for a second referendum, we have the UKIP activists shut down on Facebook.

On a week that Tommy Robinson smashes the BBC in public and blatantly calls them liars Facebook closes down his account and several Facebook people and groups pages.

When did Facebook sell out and become the informant for the Government?

You have the right to be worried. You have the right to take action.

Take action or take slavery.

Your choice.” end quote.

There is a pressing need for fewer ego-trips and greater unity of purpose; which is why we offer, via ‘cpr4d@livingstones.uk’ a rallying point for all of us, as this oppression continues to escalate. A way forward DOES present itself; it will take more of that courage and determination, but the time is near when you will be arrested…

** translation ‘ “Woe unto him that steppeth out of line!”