Author: Andrew Livingstone

In Washington State [WA] – USA the Department of Health has received over one hundred reports of covid-19 in fully vaccinated individuals.

These cases were reported to epidemiologists more than two weeks after the vaccinated individuals received their second dose. Health authorities are now referring to these post vaccination covid-19 positives as “breakthrough cases.” There is clearly no certainty that the two-dose vaccine protocol actually prevents infections, hospitalization or mortality at all, which debunks any scientific rationale currently being used to falsely justify the need for Vaccine Passports – and the widespread segregation of the unvaccinated.

The hospitalization and the mortality rate are both high for covid-19 infected persons who previously accepted the vaccines

Since February 1, 2021, epidemiologists have recorded 102 “breakthrough cases” of covid-19 across 18 counties in WA alone, which begs the question – How are all the other States faring?

A shocking eight percent of those cases were severe and required hospitalization. Two of the individuals, both over the age of 80, passed away from the very infection that the vaccines were supposed to prevent.

In just one month, 1.2 million people were vaccinated in Washington State, even though only 0.01 percent of those vaccinated had actually tested positive for covid-19.

Positivity rates for the general population are generally much higher. However, a shocking eight percent of those people who became infected with covid-19 post vaccination then required hospitalization. Of those, the mortality rate has so far been an appalling two percent.

This state-wide data shows a dismally high hospitalization and mortality RATE for people who get covid-19 AFTER VACCINATION. Moreover, there are likely many more cases of covid-19 infection and similar respiratory infections post vaccination, but these cases are not being recorded as part of this public health pandemic. This is because vaccinated individuals are less likely to take covid tests once they are deemed “protected.”

Additionally, any respiratory infection that mirrors the symptoms of covid-19 is no longer being classified as covid-19, post vaccination. Many of the vaccination sites are replacing covid-19 testing sites, thus naturally reducing the number of positives in these vaccinated populations. Also, those vaccinated individuals are no longer being required to take the tests in order to travel to certain regions.

How many more cases of covid-19 (false or real) would be detected if the ‘vaccinated’ were held to the same testing protocol as the ‘unvaccinated’? The unvaccinated are the ones now being pressured to take the ‘covid’ tests for travel, thus driving up statistically the number of cases for the unvaccinated, no matter if these cases be ‘false positives’, ‘mild infections’ or severe illnesses.

The likelihood of covid-19 positives in the fully vaccinated could well be much higher if they too were required to take the tests like everyone else. The assumption that the vaccinated are perfectly healthy and not spreading infections compared to their peers is a scam designed to perpetrate the introduction and use of Vaccine Passports.

The ‘fully vaccinated’ are getting sick and dying regardless of covid-19 statistics

Similar covid-19 infections, caused by covid-19 variants, are now showing up among those fully vaccinated. The Washington State Department of Health is investigating patterns among these “breakthrough cases.” Health authorities are identifying “covid-19 variants” which infect the fully vaccinated. If vaccines were really intended to work as publicized, how many more doses of vaccine will now be needed in order to put a stop to all these covid-19 ‘variants’?

Perhaps the widespread use of vaccines is putting pressure on such viruses, thus causing more mutations? Do the current covid-19 vaccines put everyone else at risk to new variants? Washington State Secretary of Health, Dr. Umair Shah, is calling for the fully vaccinated to wear masks and avoid other people – which appears to be an open confession that the vaccines do not work. As those fully vaccinated continue to get sick and die, there will soon be nothing left to blame but the vaccines.

Yet the vaccines probably won’t officially get the blame, and prideful public health authorities, supported by baleful career politicians, will continue to call for both Vaccine Passports and mass compliance, thus ensuring the greatest failure of modern science.

The underlying causes of immune system failure, medical fraud, and medical malpractice are apparently being ignored in the push to force endless vaccines on the world.

Let us hope that someone has got Dr Reiner Füllmich’s back, since he seems to be among the few determined to have this Silent Weapon eliminated in the correct way.

With a hat-tip to L J Devon – A Final Warning

We are all well aware that this has been a very stressful and bizarre 12 months, but, if you think that there is hope for a future return to ‘normal’ then my advice is – for your own and your family’s sanity and safety – do NOT accept the swab under the pretence that you are being taken there by accepting a PCR test.

Please watch this video clip;

WOW! LOOK WHAT’S PUT IN YOUR NOSE WITH THE PCR TEST – NANOBOT ALIEN TECHNOLOGY? (bitchute.com)

and you make your own conclusions.

For me, this is yet another weapon in the ongoing SWFQW – Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars – and you are very welcome to look up SWFQW as a separate blog, posted here on 24th October 2019.

Please do your own research and STAY SAFE!

It was in the summer of 1987 that I was travelling with some German business colleagues, in a left-hand-drive German-built car through the Ruhrgebiet.

As we passed the Möhne dam, there was a lull in our conversation. For a while, no-one said anything and I was reflecting how, some two years earlier, another English colleague and I, on a similar business trip, had taken the opportunity to walk across the wall of the Möhne dam – just because we could.

On that day, he and I had got our first real grasp of the immense size of the ‘Talsperre’, our minds inevitably linking back to ‘Operation Chastise’ and the daring of those aircrew who had flown so scarily low to pinpoint the detonation of Barnes Wallis’s rolling bombs.

On this day, forty-four years on, one of my passengers finally remarked

“So bad as we Germans were in the war, it was a terrible thing which happened here”

and he went on to relate how he had later spoken with one man whose home had NOT been swept away in the ensuing colossal deluge. I refrained from getting into any debate about the rights and wrongs of obtaining ‘control without authority’ – I simply said, “It was from my father that I first heard the saying ‘Truth is the first casualty in war’” – and I switched the topic.

Today, in April 2021, 34 years further down the time-track, we are all witnesses to another war – codename SWFQW – a Quiet War this one, being fought with Silent Weapons, but a war similarly commenced with neither authority nor scruple, and certainly with little regard to the tremendous suffering which follows wartime arrogance as surely as night follows day.

This time, the conspirators are smugly hidden behind seemingly impregnable walls of enormous wealth: the weaponry is different but the mantra remains the same, brazenly repeat the most ridiculous lies so relentlessly, until the majority of the plebians seem ready to accept the inevitability of it all – if nothing else, through absolute weariness.

Fortunately, now, as in the dark days of World War II, there are those whose spirit is not broken, and there is a certain irony in the concept of it being a German lawyer having the cohones to take on those whom Catherine Austin Fitts, in her video interview ‘PLANET LOCKDOWN’, describes as ‘Mr Global’. (You won’t find that online any more, it’s been taken down).

Today however, there is heartening news that there are cracks appearing in the fortifications of the globalists, and we quote:

‘Researchers from Norway, Germany and elsewhere have found evidence of a connection between the use of unproven mRNA injections and the sudden incidence of various types of blood clots’.

After umpteen months of mindlessly performing their same dogmatic catchphrase lines to camera the present UK actors have reluctantly had to acknowledge more than two dozen new cases of thrombosis – nine of them fatal – following the jab.’

It seems the dam may finally have been breached. All we can hope for is that those responsible for this continual misinformation are the ones who get swept aside.

Check out the report via the following link.

Confirmed: AstraZeneca Experimental COVID Injection Causes Fatal Blood Clots – Trials with Children Halted – Vaccine Impact

Written by Sonia Elijah – published in ’Conservative Woman’ – 1^st April 2021

IN Parts 1 and 2 of this series, I investigated the failings of the real time RT-PCR test in detecting Covid-19 and the controversies associated with the Corman-Drosten research paper that published its workings.

In Part 3, I go further into these controversies and report on the subsequent launch of the largest class-action lawsuit in history, led by Dr Reiner Fuellmich, centering on the charge of the fraudulently marketed PCR test.

Turning first to the authors of the Corman-Drosten (CD) paper published in Eurosurveillance on January 23, 2020, one of the two lead authors, German virologist Professor Christian Drosten, was one of the first scientists to identify the SARS virus and develop a testing kit for it in 2003. It was his close associate and co-author’s company (Olfert Landt’s TIB Molbiol) that was first to come to market with the SARS testing kit and then later with the RT-PCR testing kit for SARS-CoV-2.

Marco Kaiser, another co-author of the CD paper, is also a scientific adviser to TIB Molbiol. Though there are clear and significant conflicts of interests, they were not stated in the original CD paper. However, after Eurosurveillance’s editorial team were contacted regarding this controversy (and after Drosten and Landt had denied they had a conflict of interest) the paper was finally updated on July 29, 2020, to include the conflict of interest for Landt and Kaiser. Drosten’s name was not included in the conflicts of interests’ statement as one of the editors of Eurosurveillance.

Drosten was turned into an overnight star after developing the real time RT- PCR test for SARS-CoV-2, which was accepted as the standard of testing by the World Health Organisation [WHO]. On March 17, 2020, the German weekly magazine Stern published an article headlined ‘This is how Christian Drosten became the most important man in Germany.’

Drosten is the director of the Institute of Virology at Berlin’s Charité hospital, one of Germany’s largest university hospitals, which happens to be a recipient of generous grants from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Dr Victor Corman, the other lead author of the paper, also works at Charité’s Institute of Virology. Drosten’s evaluations have heavily influenced German government policy on mandatory mask wearing, school closures and lockdowns.

Looking into Dorsten’s career history, we find he was heavily involved in Germany’s swine flu controversy in 2009. He predicted:

 ‘It is a widespread viral infection with side-effects far more severe than anyone could imagine from the most dangerous vaccine.’

At his urging, hundreds of millions of euros was spent on a rushed-through vaccine, GlaxoSmithKline’s Pandemrix. His doomsday prophecy never came to pass, with only 30 confirmed swine flu deaths in Germany. However Pandemrix proved to have severe consequences, with links to narcolepsy in both children and adults. Dorsten’s doomsday prediction echoes that of Professor Neil Ferguson detailed in my investigation into Sage. He similarly warned of 65,000 deaths from swine flu in the UK in 2009; in fact only 457 deaths were linked to the virus. Based on Ferguson’s model, the UK government spent £1.2billion to prepare for the swine flu pandemic. More than 20million doses of vaccine were left over.

Another co-author of the CD research paper is Professor Maria Zambon, a British virologist who is a member of Sage and Nervtag and is on the WHO International Health Regulations emergency committee. Zambon is also director of Reference Microbiology for Public Health England. She is highly influential, both in the UK and on the world stage.

In Part 1 of my investigative report, I wrote that the WHO accepted the Corman-Drosten PCR testing protocol (of which Zambon is a co-author) for the novel coronavirus as early as January 13, 2020, knowing full well that it had not been peer-reviewed at that stage. It was, however, supposedly ‘peer-reviewed’ in an unprecedented 24 hours, the time between when the paper was submitted (January 21) and published (January 23) in Eurosurveillance. This ‘official’ peer review has inexplicably never been released, even after repeated requests by an international consortium of scientists. What is also odd is that the WHO did not declare the novel virus to be a pandemic until almost two months later, on March 11, 2020. The question of whether, as a co-author of the CD paper, Zambon’s influential ties with the WHO helped garner their instant approval of it certainly needs asking.

A close associate of Zambon at PHE’s Virus Reference Department (VRD) based in Colindale, London, is Dr Joanna Ellis, another co-author of the CD paper. She works as the scientific lead in the Respiratory Virus Unit (RVU). The VRD is a WHO-accredited national laboratory. It’s hard not to draw the conclusion that both Zambon and Ellis would have heavily influenced the way the UK government responded to the novel virus by quickly implementing a mass testing programme on an epic scale, using the Corman-Drosten protocol of real time RT-PCR testing for the virus.

As I discussed in Part 1, billions of pounds was spent by the UK government on the country’s mass PCR testing programme that has been proved to be ‘not fit for purpose’ and a gross waste of taxpayers’ money. What’s even more tragic is the way it’s being used to justify the perpetual lockdowns which have devastated lives and led to hundreds of thousands of non-Covid deaths internationally.

What’s also interesting to note is that in the CD paper published in Eurosurveillance, the authors claimed ‘before public release of virus sequences from cases of 2019-nCoV, we relied on social media reports [my emphasis] announcing detection of a SARS-like virus. We thus assumed that a SARS-related CoV is involved in the outbreak’. They go on to report that ‘we downloaded all complete and partial SARS-related virus sequences available in GenBank by 1 January 2020’. This appears to be a significant anomaly as the research paper begins by stating: ‘A novel coronavirus currently termed 2019-nCoV was officially announced as the causative agent by Chinese authorities on 7 January.’

It’s highly questionable why, more than a week before the Chinese authorities officially announced a novel coronavirus named 209-nCoV (later renamed SARS-CoV-2) as ‘the causative agent’, the co-authors decided to ‘rely’ on social media that a SARS-like virus had been detected. The next step they took was to download all the SARS related sequences ‘by January 1’ to develop an RT-PCR test designed to detect this new virus whose genome sequence was not officially been published until January 10.

 In November, 2020, the 22-strong International Consortium of Scientists in Life Sciences (ICSLS) officially challenged the Corman-Drosten (CD) paper, submitting their own external peer review to Eurosurveillance. The lead author was Dr Pieter Borger and among the co-authors was Dr Michael Yeadon, former vice president of Pfizer. I referenced this in Part 1, saying that the external peer review found ten major flaws of the RT-PCR test in detecting SARS-CoV-2. They strongly criticised the CD paper for not undergoing a legitimate peer review and for its ‘flawed science’, and they called its authors ‘intellectually dishonest’.

This brings me to Dr Reiner Fuellmich, a top German and US trial lawyer, who has won unprecedented lawsuits against Deutsche Bank and Volkswagen. He is leading a team of 34 lawyers the group is called Stiftung Corona Ausschuss – (the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry) seeking to prosecute global officials over Covid-19 lockdowns in the largest class-action lawsuit in history. The lawsuits will be launched in Canada and the US, and then can be joined by ‘all affected parties worldwide’. In fact, the first lawsuit has been started in Norway..

A February 2021 article in the Alberta Press states that the suit will ‘target those they believe are responsible for the lockdowns, from local level politicians to the World Health Organisation (WHO) and pharmaceutical companies. They seek damages for people negatively impacted by lockdowns, saying it is a deliberate crime against humanity and must be legally qualified as crimes against humanity, as defined in Section 7 of the International Criminal Code.’

Fuellmich explains: 

‘Our focus is upon the PCR test because if we manage to convince a court of law that this is a fraudulent PCR test being marketed with the assertion that it can detect infection – if we can convince a court of law that this is a false statement – then the whole house of cards is going to come crashing down.’

In a video presentation posted on YouTube in October 2020 Fuellmich explains how since July 2020 he and his team have been listening to the testimonies of a large number of international scientists and experts ‘to find answers to questions about the corona crisis that people worldwide are asking’.

https://www.youtube.com/embed/hfhCEwbRRsI?start=1&feature=oembed He goes on to argue why ‘this corona crisis must be renamed a corona scandal and [why]those responsible for it must be criminally prosecuted and sued for civil damages . . . so that no one will ever again be in a position of such power as to be able to defraud humanity with their corrupt agendas.’

I for one cannot wait to see how this case will unfold.  Humanity is counting on it.

Saturday 3rd April 2021 – DONATIONS TOTAL:

Thanks to the tremendous generosity of so many of you good people we have succeeded where many said we would fail: in just over four weeks, our team work enabled us to collect the total shown above, which was more than was needed to meet Lyn’s legal expenses. Please note that the ‘landing page’ for donations is now CLOSED. I am sure you will understand that any surplus funds have been passed directly to Lyn, to help her get up and running again.

Now is not the time or place to comment on the actual outcome of those final worrying days which Lyn spent in the Paris Court. Suffice it to say that she has been told to expect a suspended sentence, and that this will be confirmed at a further Court sitting on Wednesday 14th April 2021. Lyn has been told that she need not return to France to attend in person; her lawyer, M. Olivier Forray, will be there on her behalf.

We do not forget David Noakes at this time; that date will be a concern for him, as he has been told to expect a 4-year custodial sentence, although he has 14 days in which to lodge an appeal against this decision.

When we know more about that we will post details. It may be necessary to resume funding for David.

On behalf of Lyn Thyer and her Team, we want to say a special and most sincere ‘THANK YOU‘ to the staff at UK Column for their work in keeping us followers aware and up-to-date on this issue. We will not forget that..

Sincerely yours

Andrew Livingstone – Huddersfield, West Yorkshire