Political

Where do you stand?

Because we see that ‘party’ politics is now no longer ‘fit for purpose’, LIVINGSTONES UK is looking for men and women of good local reputation, of sound mind and of a reasonable educational standard, who are willing to stand, at the next General Election, as ‘INDEPENDENT’ candidates.

Those who are genuinely interested will receive help and guidance as to just how this is to be achieved in detail. Each candidate will apply to stand in their own constituency – ‘Local people for local issues’ – and each will basically share the same manifesto points on the issues which are tearing the country apart: to these main points will then be added up to five other issues of concern within the area where he/she lives.

Listed below are twelve proposed themes for a manifesto. Please read them through carefully and then give them  a number, in the priority order YOU would rate them, from 1 through to 12, where 1 = most urgent, etc: now PRINT off a copy with your preferred order of importance in the blank squares, SCAN the page back in an email to the address at the foot of the page; or even return it by snail-mail to PO Box 1684 HD9 1AU.

  leave the European Union NOW, on our terms. UK economy needs clear leadership NOW!
  absolutely no further extension of ‘transition’ periods beyond March 2019
  global trading to start in March 2019, if not before.
  no concessions to the EU over the 200-mile limit on our territorial waters
  efficient immigration control of our borders
  cut ‘foreign aid’ budget, split the savings 50/50 between the NHS and Defence budget
  ditch the European Court of Justice, European Arrest Warrant, reinstate ‘habeas corpus’.
  say ‘NO’ to the prospect of our Armed Services joining the EU military union (PESCO)
  absolutely no ‘severance’ money to be paid to the corrupt European Union.
  reinstate capital punishment in cases involving the sexual violation of persons (male or female) where the victim is murdered, once lust is sated.
  reinstate capital punishment where unprovoked attacks on civilians result in fatalities.
  proscribe unofficial procedures which recommend practices and punishments contrary to those of Her Majesty’s Courts.

Don’t forget, your manifesto will also include up to FIVE other issues of importance in your own area, so think about that carefully.

If these points hit home with you, or with other people you know, who will stand as candidates, please contact us on: info@livingstones.uk for further details and an Application Form, or call us on 07496 536670 or simply post your CV to: PO Box 1684 Huddersfield HD9 1AU.

If we all pull together, we can remove this corrupt ‘party’ attitude and return our nation to real democracy. The truth is, there are many more than the 17.4 millions who actually voted on 23.06.16 who by now ARE ready  to LEAVE the Evil Unelected [EU], what we have to do is to mobilize ourselves to make this actually happen.

Constitutional, Democracy

‘Do we live in a democracy’?

At a public meeting in York recently, the audience was asked this simple question, and, surprisingly, from a crowd of adults, the response was muted – many of us were not too sure..

Using the ‘false flag’ of ‘democracy’, the UK ‘Party System’ has, over a great many years, evolved to become a cancer, a perpetual revolution against the truths of the English Constitution.

Edmund Burke, [1730-1797] a one-time MP for Malton, North Yorkshire wrote:

“Whenever Parliament is persuaded to assume the role of executive government it will lose all the confidence, love and veneration which it has ever enjoyed whilst it was supposed to be the corrective and control on the acting powers of the state..”

Here is another quote to reiterate the present position:

“The Party System does not consist, as some suppose, of two parties, but only of ONE. If there were two real parties there could be no system. In the presence of this inner obstacle, a VOTE becomes about as valuable as a railway ticket when there is a permanent block on the line”

G.K. Chesterton – A Short History of England

We need to learn, and learn quickly, that

the rule of (common) law is the absolute condition for personal liberty and true democracy in a free society. Without it, we will have the rule of tyrants.

Let us assume, as seems extremely likely, that the present Tory leader will NOT achieve any sort of ‘deal’ for her to-ing and fro-ing across the Channel. After the charade which we have witnessed over the past two years, do you honestly think we can trust politicians of ANY colour, to fulfil the terms of the Referendum vote?

Not BLUE, not RED, the SNP? They are all against it; as for LibDems, Greens, even UKIP, – the party which fought for so long to persuade the Tories to ALLOW us to choose by Referendum – can’t now stop fighting amongst themselves. Even recently (July 30 2018) they were still in dispute over the function of their NEC.

So, are you going to mention the newly-formed DVP, or perhaps, FOR BRITAIN? It takes 5 years and around £20m in funds to establish any new party which would even START to make a dent in the Tory ranks.

At that next election, what do you imagine you will really achieve, unless you use your vote to kick the corrupt parties out of Parliament, by the simple alternative of voting for an INDEPENDENT candidate?

The fact of the matter is that we have become a very lazy society, and we have let ourselves, by habit and convenience, be lulled into accepting the adage first promoted by Harold Macmillan

“We’ve never had it so good.”

Many of us have ceased to think very deeply for ourselves, with the result that we have, as a nation, been sleep-walked into accepting what has been published to us, from the end of World War II onwards.

The fact is that, just seven years after we had finally (with the help of our former colonies across the pond, and many brave Commonwealth – and Polish – souls) put the Fatherland back in its place, there was already a plan in hand to achieve, by economic means, what the Austrian painter/decorator (as my now deceased German brother-in-law used to say – ‘der war auch Asylant’) had failed to do with his super-efficient ‘Wehrmacht’ = ‘Defence Force’ – there’s a bitter laugh.

The late King George VI was only three months laid to rest when Jean Monnet, one of the founding fathers of the European Union, was writing to a friend – 30th April 1952:

‘Europe’s nations should be guided towards the super-state (1952??) without their people understanding what is happening. This can be accomplished by successive steps, each disguised as having an ‘economic’ purpose, but which will eventually and irreversibly lead to federation.’

Now, I could list for you, every single piece of ‘statute’ which has been moulded and fiddled to fit in with that mantra of the unelected oligarchy, masquerading as a benevolent unifying presence, from 1948 right through to 2009 – but you know most of them, don’t you?

What a close examination of the text and purport of all the ‘Treaties’ shows us is, that those who have held the position of ‘UK Leader’, under their version of ‘democracy’, have sold our country’s soul to the devil – as surely as Faust lost his shadow to Mephistopheles..

So, we come, late in the day, to the frightening conclusion that we are in imminent danger of being totally emasculated as a nation, of having a minor role in an ever-growing federation of half-convinced ‘states’ (note how THAT word crept in) – are we to be the Northern Section of some cooked-up French arrondisement?

All of which can still be averted, by simply reasserting our inalienable rights as freemen/women under the Great Charter of 1215, as confirmed by the Bill of Rights 1689.

The ‘Party System’ in UK politics is DEAD, not fit for purpose (never was) and must be removed if our nation is to retain any vestige of status, dignity and self-government.

Forget Facebook, typing and ranting will not save us – ‘Shadowbanning’ is already in hand, closing down your right to think and speak freely. Send an email address today, to

info@livingstones.uk

for further action, whilst there is still time.       See also                 www.livingstones.blog

Other important sources:

http://www.newchartistmovement.org.uk

http://www.britishconstitutiongroup.com

http://www.denouncethedeception.co.uk

http://www.commonlawcourt.com

http://www.democracydefined.org

http://www.thebernician.net

http://www.self-realisation.com

http://www.ukcolumn.org

http://www.cpexposed.com

Spiritual

Worth fighting for?

I make no apology for, now and again, quoting from our own spiritual rule book: after all, on just about every corner, on every social media page, we are being inundated with the ‘wisdom of the prophet’ and told how wonderful all his life and writings were.

So, let’s try this for size : Ephesians 6:10-20. Have a read and blog me back when you can spot what is missing from the soldier’s kit.

Cast your mind back a couple of years, Alexander Blackman – ring any bells? – was put to the sword in a British court for killing an enemy soldier during an action in Afghanistan. Remind me, whose idea was it, to equip our front-line men and women with headcams??

It is clear that our government is a puppet show, and the strings are being pulled by overseas forces, who somehow, seem to ‘have the drop’ on any UK politicians, of whatever colour. There is a publication which I recommend to you – ‘Secret Affairs – Britain’s collusion with radical Islam’ – by Mark Curtis, and available, like everytjhing else, on Amazon.. It’s pretty heavy going, but all the detailed facts are there.

Today, on social media, we are informed that, having risked life and limb for the defence? of what? – our land from invasion, our fading memory of Commonwealth glory,? our retired military men and women are not being given the respect and support which they are due – post service days. Just this past week (12th – 18th August 2018) we hear that six more British ‘veterans’ have ended their own lives; 18 have died by their own hand since April, and 42 in all so far this year.

Meanwhile, the same government, which cannot be concerned for those ‘lucky’ enough to survive, are desperate to get the remainder of our sadly denuded military force into the EU – PESCO. I leave you to guess why TM is in such a hurry to get that organized…

This is the same party which, in the years from 2011 to 2016 has given away, in so-called ‘foreign aid’, an AVERAGE of £1.9billion every MONTH to a total of 146 overseas countries, without any real idea as to who ACTUALLY benefits from our charity. That money came from your and my taxes. To speak specifically about the Afghanistan donation, that has been £6.7bn – plus our brave soldiers’ lives and limbs.

My friends and I are so angry about the Westmonster corruption that we are doing something about it – http://www.democracy17-4.org – we will approach the next General Election with an INDEPENDENT candidate standing for every one of the 650 places available on those privileged green benches. Please do consider either standing as an INDEPENDENT, or recommending someone who can. My own email connection can also be used – ‘info@livingstones.uk’ – for further details as to how this will work. Here are the disgusting figures for those six years, and it still goes on.

Click to access 14-08-18-foreign-aid-figures.pdf

Constitutional

When is ‘Rebellion’ lawful?

What is lawful rebellion? (Or being a ‘freeman/woman’ on the land)

Here, Nancy Baron-Shaw gives a little basic background to it.

(Please note this is not comprehensive it’s just a rough guide)

In the year 1215 the first of our constitutional rights were set down on paper, it was called the Magna Carta, this was basically an oath from the crown (King or Queen) to uphold the rights of the people set down in it, and to look after the people’s best interests. In return for the crown’s promise to the people, they in turn agreed to be ruled by the crown, so it was a contract between crown and people, and it became the law. The crown had a duty to uphold those rights and the Common Law, as did the people, not to cause death, harm, loss or injury to another, nor to be fraudulent in their contracts (in other words be honest and true).

In the year 1689 the Bill of Rights was set down on paper; this endorsed all the rights given in the Magna Carta, plus a few more, both documents containing our UK Common Law, written down and continuing to form our Law.

These two documents are the fundamental parts of our UK constitution, yes, we do, actually, have one. Though many may claim that the UK has no written constitution, this is not true. We have the most respected constitution in the world, which also forms the basis of the constitutions of the USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and India.

Rather than being one written document we have several that make up the UK constitution, the primary one being the Magna Carta, plus the 1689 Bill of Rights. (the freeman movement in Canada seems to be gaining respect from some Canadian policemen).

Parts of both the Magna Carta and the 1689 Bill of Rights state that they cannot be repealed because they are such well-made laws and rights!

Lord Justice Laws stated, on 18th February 2002:

“The special status of constitutional statute follows the special status of constitutional rights. Examples are the Magna Carta, and, also the Bill of Rights 1689…Ordinary statutes may, by implication, be repealed. Constitutional statutes may not….”

Now, our ancestors were not daft, they knew there may be a problem one day, if the ‘crown’ became unjust, or turned into some sort of dictatorship, or if parliament were to act against the interests and wellbeing of the people, or become full of corruption, or not allow the crown to keep its oath.

In Article 61 of the Magna Carta it was written that, if this ever happened, citizens could petition the crown to sort out the problem (crown’s or parliament’s – if it was them), following which petition, the crown had 40 days to either fix the problem – or dissolve parliament.

If, in those 40 days, nothing was resolved, the petitioner could then lawfully go into rebellion against both the crown and parliament, until such a time as the situation was resolved.

Because this is lawful, and the petitioner has the right to do it, he goes into “lawful rebellion”, at that point in time he no longer has allegiance to either crown or parliament, since they have become corrupt. He now becomes a hindrance and a rebel, fighting to end the corruption or injustice within the system. It is law that he can do this, and he is, actually, obeying the law by doing so, because it is the people’s duty to fight corruption and uphold the law.

So that’s the basics of it. Because our constitution can’t be repealed it is still valid law.

Now, to do this today, you must first send an affidavit (a sworn oath of truth, the most powerful lawful and legal document you can get) to our Queen, stating that the crown or in this case our government (and its MPs acting for the crown) is breaking the constitutional contract (and they really are breaking it), and demand it be fixed within 40 days. This affidavit must be witnessed, counter signed and sealed by a credible witness (Nancy Baron-Shaw used a solicitor).

This is then sent to the queen, and, if within 40 days the problem is not fixed, a second affidavit is then sent, this time declaring that the problem is not resolved, and therefore the crown (or the government acting for the crown) has broken the contract with the people, and you are therefore no longer going to obey or be ruled by a corrupt crown or government, putting you in a state of lawful rebellion.

Contrary to what any government official may like tell you, this is a lawful action, and it is a binding oath sworn before God (and the witness), it is my right, it is your right, everyone’s right, to do this, but only if there is a genuine breach of the contract.

The powers that be want us to believe that we have no constitution – that in anything we may be planning to do is based on a law which has long since been repealed, or 90% of it.

It’s in their interests to have you believe this, so they can get away with anything they want to do, without the people stopping them.

As you can see from the statement by Lord Justice Laws, it is our constitution and it cannot simply be scrapped by any parliament, not by our self-serving politicians; it remains a valid law to this day, no matter what our politicians say, they have never ever had the right to repeal any of it.

An example of one of the actual breaches we are using for entering lawful rebellion is – corruption in parliament and our government – we all know this is happening, It’s not just the one party, its all of them. There are 650 incumbents – 164 of them are on the Sex Offenders List, for a start.

The fact is that both past and present governments have acquiesced in allowing foreign powers (the European Union) to rule over us. The EU is a hugely corrupt system, and it is not working in anyone’s best interests except for the EU politicians themselves and the weighty business associates supporting them. The EU is nothing but a dictatorship, being run by un-elected leaders – look into it, and you will see that this is the true situation.

When, in 1992, the Tory government, led by John Major, signed the ‘Maastricht’ Treaty, handing over British sovereignty to the EU, they were committing treason!

This is 100% true, they really have committed treason, (take a look at the UKIP website for some very interesting facts and figures. It is beyond belief what the EU gets up to (and I’m just citing UKIP – as they have collected a lot of factual information, not that they are the exception to any other party).

The EU is our people’s greatest enemy, but second to that, our present government and most of the mainstream parties are equally culpable. I know that the police and the Courts are supposed to be non-political, (did you know that both are today registered as ‘limited companies’ in the UK?) but we all have the right to freedom of thought and I am sure you must realize what a corrupt ‘leadership’ we currently have?

When our government does something wrong, they just pretend they haven’t done it, and, if it gets to be too hot a subject, they simply stick a gagging order on it! .

Lawful and Legal What’s The Difference?

There’s a lot of talk on the freeman sites (and other sites) about being ‘lawful and legal’   and discussing the difference between the two, but as there’s not much in the way of a basic guide, it becomes confusing; some will know the difference but for those who don’t here we go. Basically, anything in our constitution including common law is lawful (true law).

Any subsequent ‘Acts’ that parliaments may have subsequently passed are ‘legal’, these will be in the form of acts or statute laws, these “legal” acts should never contradict common law nor what is in our constitution, some of them do, but we won’t go into that here.

We therefore still have, even today, a system in place, extant for over 800 years, that can neither be challenged nor changed (common law and our constitution), therefore should any parliament wish to pass new ‘legal’ Acts, it is bound, by definition, to find a way of making that Act enforceable, whilst still honouring the constitution.

Now, the Royal Navy had already used a legal system called ‘Admiral Law’ to keep its sailors in check and to make sure that officers and navy rules were obeyed.  All navy members swear an oath to obey it etc, it becomes a legal contract and so it is enforceable. It applies only on ships and within the navy, but it works well. Because it pre-dated the establishing of ‘parliament’, it was adopted (or a version of it), and thus parliament has since worked using that system to introduce new “legal” statutes.

For the system to work, the people had to accept that it was lawful – and, perhaps since the common man did not know any different, it was simply taken as being right and was obeyed – yet none of the general public (naval personnel excepted) has ever sworn any oath to either parliament or crown, so there is no binding contract between legal acts or statutes and the people, rather we have been duped into obeying them.

A statute or act is in legal terms defined as “an act given the force of law by the consent of the governed”, note it says consent, so if you don’t consent to it and there is no contract between yourself and the other party, then it does not become ‘legal’.

So now you see why freemen (and those claiming to be freemen) may say

“I do not consent, and there is no contract between us, I have broken no law”

when the police are going to arrest them or make them obey an act or statute legislation

An excellent summary of the actual legal position of the common man/woman with regard to the Constitution. Used by kind permission of the writer – Nancy Baron-Shaw

 Recommended reading – ‘A Layman’s Guide to the English Constitution’ – Albert Burgess

Spiritual

The Granite Necklace

At the moment, I can’t find it, but somewhere, I have a dreadful photograph, taken in what used to be the fine land of Syria. It shows a small girl, perhaps 5 or 6 years old, dressed in a pretty blue dress, white socks and shoes, lying on the ground – her head severed from her body. This clearly happened because her parents had dared to hold a different opinion about ‘faith’ and ‘family values’. I suggest that, had that occurred here in the UK, there would have been many extra copies of newspapers sold, hand-wringing at every ‘official’ level, accompanied with repeated assurances that steps would be taken to ensure such a thing NEVER happened again.

Now, let’s just check here – if we dust off our family bible,and turn to Matthew 18:1-6, we have a section on what our Prophet thinks about anyone who interferes with young children (male or female). He recommends that we tie a millstone around the offender’s neck and take them for a dip in the local lake, which goes in stark contrast to that which is approved by the father of the Islamic nation. His followers insist that it is acceptable for men to take a six-year old female as a ‘wife’ – mind you, they seem to be able to wait until the child is nine before ‘consummating’ the relationship.

Across the globe, we can see countries infested with this evil ideology, and bent on eradicating every other type of social function which differs from that laid down by their man (the only ‘prophet’ who, actually, never seems to have ‘prophesied’ much at all). If you get and study the book – ‘Mohammed and the Unbelievers’, published by the Center for the Study of Political Islam [CSPI], and available via Amazon, you will soon learn what Mohammed had in mind for everyone who dares to disagree with his ideas.

Wherever it has appeared, this form of Islam (= submit or else) has always caused disruption. It is doing so here in the (dis)United Kingdom today: our mission is the same today as that of our monarchy one thousand years ago – to confront, control and be rid of it.

However, it is obvious that here, ‘there is something rotten in the state of Britain’, when, over the decades since the end of World War II, we have invited and/or allowed citizens of other (mostly former Commonwealth) countries to settle in our sceptered isle, irrespective of spiritual condition or political persuasion, knowing that they bring with them their hideous culture.

Some of these souls have arrived in a state of extreme distress and obvious penury, fleeing for their lives from some hideous, self-appointed tyrannical ‘leader’.

These have gambled that the nation which has a worldwide reputation for ‘christian’ charity could be relied upon to provide succour and sanctuary to such.

Others of that persuasion, however, have seen our international status as a prize to be coveted, our financial institutions as a benefit to be exploited, and have created a lucrative business out of assisting fit, young, bearded, mobile-phone-carrying male (mostly) ‘children’ to reach this European Elysium  of ‘milk and honey’ uninvited, and often at extreme risk to their lives [Home Office Ref: 1178819 M is a case in point] with the clear intent of sponging on our generosity and at the same time, working to subvert our democratic status, thus to replace it with a monstrous, inhumane form of social manipulation. It is a testament to our asinine national governments (all shades), that, far from maintaining control of orderly immigration, we have actually ‘opened the city gates and let down the drawbridge’..

It is noticeable that the few of us who actually dare to point out the inherent risks to our ‘western’ society of allowing such mass migration, are met with a deafening silence (as my old mum used to say, with a ‘bag of IGNORE).

We are already losing count of the number of unprovoked attacks, carried out on UK streets, by servants of ‘Allah the Great’, all designed to cause public mayhem, instil terror and force our tolerant, democratic attitude into servile compliance with their version of law. Little wonder, then, that there are some elements of our indigenous ‘white’ population, who are angered to the point of active retaliation.

How pathetically sad to see that our ‘appeasing’ government, police service, judiciary (supported by an imbalance in media reporting) seem bent on emphasizing the atrocity, whenever the miscreant is identified as an evilly-motivated ‘white racist’ person, on whom the most severe sanctions must be imposed, whilst, in those multiple cases where the culprit is reluctantly acknowledged to be of the Muslim ideology, the courts inevitably take note of the most ludicrous ‘social’ reasons why this particular soul was uncharacteristically ‘disturbed’ enough to make mincemeat of some totally random victim – and hand down an inappropriately lenient sentence.

For these reasons, I move that those fortunate enough to be elected to the green benches, following the impending demise of this present ineffective set of incumbents, should make it a solid point on their manifesto to re-instate capital punishment, the more particularly in cases which involve the sexual violation of minors (male or female) where the victim is then murdered, once carnal lust has been satisfied.

I also move that, in cases of deliberate random killing of defenceless victims – and I am thinking of indiscriminate ‘bombings’ at public events, on public transport, etc. – those responsible should also pay with their lives.

To those who will now commence to howl about ‘human’ rights and ‘inhumane’ treatment, I will say, there will shortly be another publication to show why capital punishment is better understood in some 56 countries across the globe than we can bring ourselves to understand it here.

When we look back over the past seven decades, we see a clear pattern has emerged; there has been enormous influence exerted upon British government of all shades to ‘compromise’ for the sake of apparently improved relationships with overseas regimes, ostensibly for commercial benefits, perhaps founded upon a desire to see ‘Great’ Britain cling on to its fading pink map of hegemony. This has happened at the cost of our national integrity, and usually because the love of money has also been a significant motivator.

(‘Secret Affairs’ by Mark Curtis – subtitle ‘Britain’s collusion with radical  Islam analyses the history of this sorry situation)

Of equal significance is the emergence, since 1952, of an insidious plan to convert the whole of Europe into a godless federation. Just seven years after the end of World War II hostilities, plans were already in hand to achieve by economic means what the Austrian painter/decorator had failed to achieve in six years of military aggression.

 “Europe’s nations should be guided towards the super-state without their people understanding what is happening. This can be accomplished by successive steps, each disguised as having an ‘economic’ purpose but which will eventually and irreversible lead to federation.” Jean Monnet ( a Founding Father of the EU), written in a letter to a friend 30th April 1952

Ask yourself, is this where you really want to be, a vassal state, eternally bound to and funding an un-elected oligarchy, whose legislature countenances and endorses the eradication of some 1,000 years of British history, culture and constitution.

If you want to inspect a possible positive alternative, please email us on ‘info@livingstones.uk’ – there remains a way ‘forward’..

If you have persisted to the end of this publication, thank you for your attention.